Re: Michael Sylvester's inanities

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Hello everyone, Rick Adams wrote: The "professional" response is simply to ignore (or kill file) messages Rick, who says that is the professional way to handle abusive and annoying message in a group such as this? I feel reading Svlyester's posts are about on the professional level of the

Re: Sylvester and his delusions of interested by peers.

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Hi Folks, On June 25, Michael Sylvester wrote: THe academician has virtually no significant impact in changing the social order. Social workers,politicians,bigots,religion are more powerful than the world of academia. This is probably related to the fact that left brain activity is duller

Michael Sylvester

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Some comments on the Sylvester issue: * What does the ACLU or the US Constitution have to do with anything here? We're a group of persons who can negotiate our own group norms. Has Sylvester been charged with a crime? Is the government involved in our interactions? Jumping in, armed with ACLU

Re: The Being There Assumption

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Linda M. Woolf wrote: Hello, Rick Adams wrote: I'm a libertarian with respect to rights. If it doesn't _directly_ harm the person or property of another, non-consenting, individual it simply isn't the government's business. There is an assumption

Re: Sylvester and his delusions of interested by peers.

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, Hank Goldstein wrote: Any "academic" psychologist who still believes and propagates the old simplistic notions about left- and right-brain activity does our discipline and her/his students a disservice. There is much more I could say about the post from which the

Re: Michael Sylvester

1999-06-26 Thread Michael Sylvester
On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, Michael Ofsowitz wrote: * Can't Sylvester just apologize and put an end to this fracas? Linda Woolf suggested a link between the act of apologizing and underlying motivations. I suspect the inability or unwillingness to apologize in this case relates more to low

Re: Michael Sylvester's inanities

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Okay, enough already!!! Can I just say that I am soo sick of these posts!!! Can we please end this topic??? I have takled with quite a few of my colleaques and we all sick of the topic on the list! Everybody has made their point (more than once, or even twice!) and it pretty

RE: Michael Sylvester

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
*sigh* This is moving from the sublime to the ridiculous. Let's get back to the business of the TEACHING of PSYCHOLOGY, please. Those having personal issues with Michael, or with anyone for that matter, should deal with them on a private basis. This particular thread is rapidly becoming tedious

functional fixation

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
I am still waiting word on my questions on the origin of the Tower of Hanoi ,and input on the American Opthomological Report on Sex and Blindness.Some discussion on the impact of left and right hemisphere re arousal would be relevant to the issue of academia amnd the social order( an issue

Whose inanities are these anyway?

1999-06-26 Thread John W. Kulig
Wow! I went fishing for a few days and came back to this! I offer a few random observations from the vantage point of someone who just skimmed about 300 Linda vs Michael posts in a brief period. I apologize to those who already said similiar things more eloquently than I can (esp. Rick Adams).

Re: Michael Sylvester's inanities

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Tipsters, I'm somewhat new on the list and have tried not to get into the debate. However, I must add my 1 cent (for what it's worth). I know that eventually some of the comments of MS would cease if they were not reinforced, but that is easier said than done. From my perspective, it's

Re: Self-Esteem?

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
To all who provided comments and recent references on self-esteem, Thank you. I'm not at all familiar with the self-esteem literature but I've worked with cognitive style measures. Are these considered indices of self-esteem? I'm sort of feeling my way towards a logical extension of

Fluff

1999-06-26 Thread John W. Nichols, M.A.
Pure fluff, but if at least some of this does not fit you, you are waaay to young to be a TIPSter. Speakers on and up. http://www.angelfire.com/bc/Kittycity/notold.html -- --== ô¿ô ==-- John W. Nichols, M.A. Assistant Professor of Psychology Computer Science

Fw: CVNet - query on teaching

1999-06-26 Thread Ron Blue
- Original Message - From: Color and Vision Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 3:04 AM Subject: CVNet - query on teaching From: Danielle Cristi Polage [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Color and Vision Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sensation and

Gesell Test

1999-06-26 Thread karen ford
Anyone know a phone number that would get me a copy of the Gesell Developmental Test (not sure about title) used with 3-4 yr olds? Thanks. Karen * Karen E. Ford, Professor of Psychology * Mesa State College * P.O. Box

Re: Whose inanities are these anyway?

1999-06-26 Thread Linda M. Woolf
Hi Folks, "John W. Kulig" wrote: someone who just skimmed about 300 Linda vs Michael posts in a brief period. I certainly hope that this interchange is not simply a Linda vs. Michael scenario. It is my perception that a number of threads are occurring simultaneously. Yes, the rapid posting