> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Miguel Roig
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 9:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Copyright?
>
>
> At 09:05 AM 6/9/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >Many students have asked for copies
On 9 Jun 00, at 10:19, Miguel Roig wrote:
> However, I wonder about the educational usefulness of this practice.
> I have heard some anecdotal evidence (perhaps here in TIPS) that
> making such slides freely available encourages absentism and
> discourages studying textbook readings. Is anyone
educational use, but I am still
>very wary of copyright violations.
I now use Power Point in most of my classes but I have only given access to the
slides in a graduate Theories of Learning course that I taught in the Fall.
There was _a lot_ of material covered in that course and some of the s
some images/graphs do not appear in their texts. As a result, I have
contemplated posting the slideshows on the web so that students may review
after the lectures. This is obviously for educational use, but I am still
very wary of copyright violations. I have seen that some of you already
post
Title: Re: Copyright Figures
Check out www.corbis.com/
I have never used them, but saved the address from an earlier TIPS posting. They call themselves
"The Place for Pictures on the Internet."
Beth Benoit
University of Massachusetts Lowell
--
From: "Rick Adams&quo
Rob wrote:
> My question is: Where can I find free pictures that are not
> protected by copyright?
There are a number of firms that provide stock photos and stock artwork
for very reasonable prices (some as low as $10.00/CD with 100 images) that
are professional quali
,
neurons, etc.).
My question is: Where can I find free pictures that are not protected by
copyright?
I assume that those of you who have written textbooks might have some
valuable input.
Thanks in advance.
Rob Flint
---
Robert W. Flint, Jr., Ph.D.
The College of
, and PERL. I just
didn't want to bother with it. =)
In my non-web classes, I don't use Blackboard. Instead, I have them
subscribe to a class listserv for out of class discussion. Also, I
post their grades (with their permission, by randomly generated ID
number) on my website. (I k
Hi Ken (and others interested in WebCT),
This is the first semester I'm trying WebCT, and so I'm just
getting my feet wet with the basics (I'm a baby-steps kind
of guy). So, right now I use it for just a few things. I post a
copy of the syllabus. I also post an outline for each of my
lecture
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 08:51:29 -0500 (EST) Pat Cabe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My understanding is that, at least by Georgia state law, if
> > web materials are password protected then you need not
> > worry about copyright. In WebCT, for example, it is very
> >
John wrote:
> If it is not illegal to cut out a cartoon or news report and post it on
> our door or bulletin board, would it be legal if we show it in the
> classroom using an opaque projector?
Since this does not involve making a physical copy of the work, merely
displaying it in essent
ibrary subscribes to ProQuest Direct so
> that we can get full text and graphics of some journal articles through
> the internet (if you access the internet through the campus network).
> They print out with a disclaimer on the bottom that says "Reproduced
> with permission of the co
Stephen Black writes on 6 Feb 99,:
> So here's the question. If we can't show a cartoon to our class
> because it violates copyright, are we also not allowed to show a
> student wearing a t-shirt with the cartoon? You may answer
> citing the copyright law of the country o
Chuck Huffman wrote to Stephen:
<<<...If they had borrowed it, then they would be violating copyright and
aiding and abetting you in your criminal picture taking. If, however, they
owned the shirt, then you would be the only one guilty of wrongdoing. The
RCMP are probably waiting out
n of castration anxiety and
> penis envy.
>
> So here's the question. If we can't show a cartoon to our class
> because it violates copyright, are we also not allowed to show a
> student wearing a t-shirt with the cartoon? You may answer
> citing the copyright law of
If we can't show a cartoon to our class
because it violates copyright, are we also not allowed to show a
student wearing a t-shirt with the cartoon? You may answer
citing the copyright law of the country of your choice.
(I don't really care, actually, but it seems to me we'r
WHOA!!!
you mean that if you teach on TV, for example, for a 'distance
learning' course you can use overheads of those same cartoons that
I cannot use in class?
Am I reading this right???
annette
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Jim Clark wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just after the post
ct?
Jim:
You are correct that to hide from criticism beneath the copyright law would not be healthy. However, it is also not possible to do so. The use of "parts" (meaning not to exceed about 10% of the original) in evlauation/criticism has always been legal. It would not, however, be
f people are able to
> take refuge behind copyright laws.
As it happens, in my Minority Studies classes, I _do_ distribute material
from right-wing racist groups (_with_ their permission)--and I've even
held a debate between a Klansman and a Nation of Islam minister
(accidental--t
at the publishers most assuredly do object to the use of their material and they must give permission- not just the author (who in many cases has very limited copyright in the areas I teach in).
Tim Shearon
___
Timothy O. Shearon, PhD
Albertson
Jim Clark sent the latest Edupage on the efforts of educators to expand
the copyright law to include presentation over digital networks.
As I'm preparing to teach my first completely web-based class this fall,
these issues are at the forefront of my thoughts (both conscious and
uncons
to my office door is a copyright
>violation. (Don't worry -- I'm not delusional enough to think that
>Charles Schulz is going to track me down and sue me over a copy of a
>cartoon that features Snoopy that's taped to my door.) :-)
>From a 1997 book I just picked a
Hi
Just after the posts on copyright, the following arrived on from
Edupage:
Edupage, 2 February 1999. Edupage, a summary of news about information
technology, is provided three times a week as a service of EDUCAUSE,
an international
Hi
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Rick Adams wrote:
> > 4. Her advice to me was pretty simple -- if there's a question, get
> > permission from the holder of the copyright. When I've had occasion to
> > do that, I've had no problems being granted permission.
>
>
Sue wrote:
> Based on the discussion that has taken place here (and a lengthy
> discussion I had with our library director), it seems that, by the
> letter of the law, copying a cartoon from the local paper, to which my
> department is subscribed, and taping it to my office door is
Miguel Roig wrote:
> Say, by
> posting these jokes, are we guilty of some sort of copyright violation? :)
> (I guess we would if the joke is copyrighted. Ay caramba. We can't even have
> fun anymore).
Which raises another question for me. :-)
Based on the discussion tha
On the same subject, would creating an overhead or handout of a table or
figure from a journal article or textbook violate copyright law?
David
***
David K. Jones
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Westminster College
Fulton, MO 65251
(573) 592-5310
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Annette wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Annette Taylor
Sent: Monday, February 01, 1999 10:18 AM
To: Tim Shearon
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: cartoons/comics (U.S. Copyright)
Well, I am still puzzled by
d on how often one used the examples-).
Annette goes on to ask:
> Does the copyright belong to the paper? to the author? and if the latter, does >it go by day, by week by month, by contractual period.
These are excellent questions. First of all there are several types of copyright. The right
on the funny pages, then that also
doesn't seem like a "whole" item--it is 1/50th. Does the copyright
belong to the paper? to the author? and if the latter, does it
go by day, by week by month, by contractual period.
It seems that this is a sufficently complicated issue that
&quo
o
> expensive/hard to actually read and/or purchase the book".
> Timothy O. Shearon, Ph.D.
Pardon me if this is a retread, I've missed about 50 posts in this thread,
but it has obviously gone beyond copyright info.
When you compare the use of a video taped snippet (obviously not you
n
> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 1999 6:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cartoons/comics (U.S. Copyright)
>
> More on copyright law:
> I've left the site from the Library of Congress for those who may have
> missed it. But we discovered a couple
More on copyright law:
I've left the site from the Library of Congress for those who may have missed it. But we discovered a couple of things you might want to include in decisions to copy text and/or show videos. Most of the copyright law has been explained fairly well in earlier discussio
eans
specified by that section, for purposes such as... teaching
(including multiple copies for classroom use)... is not an
infringement of copyright."
Here is the law from
<http://lcweb.loc.gov/copyright/title17/1-107.html>
This is the US Copyright Office at the Library of
34 matches
Mail list logo
