: FW: Netiquette and introductions
Stephen, you need to ask him what tunes the rats were playing on the
harpsichord -- Three Blind Mice, perhaps? I doubt they were playing the
Cat's
Fugue (based on a tune supposedly picked out by the composer's cat walking
on
the keyboard).
Y
Stephen Black wrote:
While introductions are interesting and welcome, there`s nothing
either in the the TIPS guidelines (see the TIPS website at the
url in my signature file) or in our general practice which
requires this. Many of us (ahem!) have never done so. So the
blunder concern is
A lurker adds his two cents.
If you check the earliest archives of TIPS you will find that as people
joined the list they submitted an introduction. This not only provided
interesting information but it also facilitated knowing people's special
areas of interest, which promoted the development
At 6:25 AM -0700 1/31/01, Jeff Ricker wrote:
I was born in Massachattakatapequa, New York on February 29th, 1980. Having
attained the Ph.D degree at the University of South Central North Dakota
Is that the Hoople campus?
* PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Psychology Dept
As I read through the comments on introductions, I puzzled once
again about who appears to be missing from this list. We see posts from
faculty in a variety of community colleges and lesser known universities
(like my own). Yet rarely is there a post from a professor at one of
the elite
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, brucebachelder wrote:
I have been subscribed, here, for a good long time now and have even
posted a
couple of times, but I now realize I may have blundered by not
introducing myself.
While introductions are interesting and welcome, there`s nothing
either in the the TIPS
