From: "Jim Guinee" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: University of Central Arkansas
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:58:52 -0600
Subject: Re: 5 theories of creationism?
Priority:
Uh...I think I may have sent part of this already. In the middle of typing
computer services called and I meant to send what I did to myself and go
back to it later. Jim Guinee
From: "Rick Adams" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 5 theories of creationism?
Ok, how about this con
At 08:42 AM 3/8/01 -0600, Jim Guinee wrote:
The more I think of the "ideal age" theory, the more intriguing I find
it. That's
the one where everything that is created looks older than it really is. Of
course, it is a biblical and geological stretch, and I don't want to cling to
some
At 03:36 PM 3/8/01 -0600, Jim Guinee wrote:
(snip)
I see what you mean. I hadn't given it much thought -- obviously -- it was
more like "hey, I've never heard that before" and don't have enough
background in the certain sciences to see the immediate difficulties.
Of course, I would have felt
At 03:36 PM 3/8/01 -0600, Jim Guinee wrote:
(snip)
I see what you mean. I hadn't given it much thought -- obviously -- it was
more like "hey, I've never heard that before" and don't have enough
background in the certain sciences to see the immediate difficulties.
Of course, I would have
Jim wrote:
I don't necessarily think so (not an expert on this) -- to me
if there were no plants at all, I think we'd have more of an
apparent contradiction.
Ok, how about this contradiction:
GEN 1:11-13 -- Describes the creation of plants, on the third day.
