Have your student go to http://www.google.com/ and search for "spirit
spirituality graduate psychology college university". I got a lot of
potentially relevant hits.
Edward I. Pollak, Ph.D., Department of Psychology,
West Chester Univ. of PA, West Chester, PA 1
>Jim Clark feels that Louis Schmier is guilty of having a "pendulum view"
>and claims that modern science is refutation since a pendulum view cannot
>predict progress. Another, less perjorative, term is the Hegelian dialectic
>which is similar except that each synthesis is different than the
It seems like ages ago that Kitty Jung posted the following message:
>A student looking towards research in mind/body/spirit
>asked which universities would be best for her to apply
>to in terms of who(m) is doing the most work in this area.
>I suggested doing a focused web s
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, jim clark wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Louis_Schmier wrote:
> > Interesting exchange. I think I am about to dive into some hot water.
> > Here goes. Some of it reminds me of something Jane Austin wrote in
> > Persuasion. People defend, she said, what they already
At 08:18 PM 01/28/2001 -0600, Paul Brandon wrote:
At 1:55 AM -0600 1/27/01, Mike Lee wrote:
>On the delicate topic of mind/body/spirit...
>>Science fiction and science have also worked well together. So too, might
>>psychology and parapsychology.
>As long as o
At 1:55 AM -0600 1/27/01, Mike Lee wrote:
>On the delicate topic of mind/body/spirit...
>Science fiction and science have also worked well together. So too, might
>psychology and parapsychology.
As long as one is aware of the difference.
Everything that is interesting is not p
Oops, sent this to Jim Clark instead of the list.
> Several list members have suggested that it would be helpful
> (if not essential) for Kitty's student to define the terms
> "mind/body/spirit." I completely agree and find it fascinating
> that there is a notab
Hi
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Louis_Schmier wrote:
> Interesting exchange. I think I am about to dive into some hot water.
> Here goes. Some of it reminds me of something Jane Austin wrote in
> Persuasion. People defend, she said, what they already believe.
> Sometimes I think that just because a p
Hi
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Mike Lee wrote:
> I consider myself scientific in my ways of thinking. Yet, I
> see no harm in the pursuits of an undergraduate student
> wanting to go beyong psychology, that which, psychological
> science has yet to explore. I think that if psychology wants
> to move f
Interesting exchange. I think I am about to dive into some hot water.
Here goes. Some of it reminds me of something Jane Austin wrote in
Persuasion. People defend, she said, what they already believe.
Sometimes I think that just because a person knows a lot he or she is not
necssarily open to
On the delicate topic of mind/body/spirit...
I consider myself scientific in my ways of thinking. Yet, I see no harm in
the pursuits of
an undergraduate student wanting to go beyong psychology, that which,
psychological science
has yet to explore. I think that if psychology wants to move
I can't find the original posting on this thread, so I apologize to Jim
Clark for the personal reply. To all others:
Without getting in to the debate that has sprung up, I would like to suggest
that there are two colleges in California (of course) that the student might
investigate giving him
Hello.
Where is Louis in this Kitty/Paul thing? KB
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Chuck Huff wrote:
> It is also useful for the student to recognize that many
> psychologists are quite hostile to investigations in this area. If
> you look at the attitudes of academia, it appears that social
> scientists (and psychologists in particular) are the least r
Miguel wrote:
===
I was going to suggest to Kitty that, instead of 'manipulating' her student
as
described above, she might simply want to show the student exactly how some
of
her colleagues reacted to the plea for assistance by simply pointing her
student to the TIPS' newsre
Kitty,
I would like to provide some potentially helpful responses.
I, too, am not quite sure what the student means by mind/body/
spirit. However, there are several APA-accredited programs,
with both master's degree and doctoral programs, which provide solid
scientific training but als
I wanted to second Paul Smith's distillation of the advice. I would
add to it that there are a variety of people doing interesting work
in the psychology of religion. A useful set of web pages has been
compiled by Michael Nielsen of Georgia Southern University at
http://www.psywww.com/psyreli
Paul et al,
you said:
>If the student is a serious student with the kind of curiosity we
>value,
Who (m) is/are we? Speak for yourself. Also, define serious.
>offers the best chance at a well-rounded and
>well-respected graduate education.
Again, according to whom?
>The pastoral programs t
Watch it, Paul. You're also paid to teach them to think critically, which
means they must consider all possible explanations. Not to teach them what
you believe to be the truth, again, that would be religion, not science.
I'm fully aware what I'm paid to do - much of which is nurturing curio
At 07:48 AM 1/26/01 -0800, you wrote:
>Considering the not-so-helpful replies I've received, I'm just going to do
>what most of you imply - manipulate the student into believing their
>interests are not valid nor respected by academics thereby forcing them to
>do something that is NOT their pas
At 7:48 AM -0800 1/26/01, K Jung wrote:
>Considering the not-so-helpful replies I've received, I'm just going to do
>what most of you imply - manipulate the student into believing their
>interests are not valid nor respected by academics thereby forcing them to
>do something that is NOT their pass
Kitty -
> Considering the not-so-helpful replies I've received, I'm
> just going to do what most of you imply - manipulate the student into
believing their
> interests are not valid nor respected by academics thereby
> forcing them to do something that is NOT their passion. Me thinks maybe
s
Today's British Medical Journal carries a short item that seems
apropos. Even if its specific relevance to this thread is
unclear, it recalls our previous discussion of the paper "Effect
of Holy Water on Growth of Radish Plants". This item may suggest
one reason for the failure of that research.
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: mind/body/spirit
>Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:26:57 -0500
>
> Another approach is to ask the student for a specific definition of
>mind/body/spirit. A glance through the last two years of _American
>Psychologist_
>articles reveals topi
Another approach is to ask the student for a specific definition of
mind/body/spirit. A glance through the last two years of _American Psychologist_
articles reveals topics of Flow and Happiness (Csikszentmihalyi, Deiner, Buss
articles), automaticity vs. free will in cliical psychology
Hi
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Gary Peterson wrote:
> I must confess I shared Tom Allaway's reaction. I would hope the
> student can differentiate psychological science from these other "shadows"
> that characterize--some would say plague, psychological practice. On the
> other hand, there are ser
I must confess I shared Tom Allaway's reaction. I would hope the
student can differentiate psychological science from these other "shadows"
that characterize--some would say plague, psychological practice. On the
other hand, there are serious ways to study whatever these terms are
referring
27 matches
Mail list logo