Nice answer!
Carol
Phone mail
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:15 PM, Mike Palij wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:57:00 -0800, Stuart McKelvie wrote:
>> Dear Tipsters,
>>
>> I like D. O. Hebb's distinction between sensation and
>> perception as a way of distinguishing bottom-up and
>> top-down proces
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:57:00 -0800, Stuart McKelvie wrote:
Dear Tipsters,
I like D. O. Hebb's distinction between sensation and
perception as a way of distinguishing bottom-up and
top-down processing.
One thing to keep in mind is that the "bottom-up" versus
"top-down" distinction originates in
My first guess is that the observer normally moves.
On Feb 8, 2016 6:39 PM, "Michael Scoles" wrote:
>
>
> He has a chapter on it. Not sure which book, but it is in my office.
> I'll try to remember to look it up in the morning.
> On Feb 8, 2016 4:59 PM, "Jim Clark" wrote:
>
>>
>> And how would
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/09/us/sat-test-changes.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=second-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Dear Tipsters,
More reading in the new SAT.
Concerns have been raised about mean scores for different groups of people.
H
He has a chapter on it. Not sure which book, but it is in my office. I'll
try to remember to look it up in the morning.
On Feb 8, 2016 4:59 PM, "Jim Clark" wrote:
>
> And how would Gibson explain ambiguous stimuli where the identical input
> gives rise to different interpretations?
>
> Jim
> Se
Hi
Because scientists consider all possible explanations/mechanisms to determine
which one is correct.
Also templates might be involved, for example in exemplar models, or even in
early learning before prototypes are developed.
Jim
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 3:35 PM, "Annette
And how would Gibson explain ambiguous stimuli where the identical input gives
rise to different interpretations?
Jim
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 8, 2016, at 3:51 PM, "Michael Scoles"
mailto:micha...@uca.edu>> wrote:
Gibson would argue that, unless by "past experience" you mean biological
e
Gibson would argue that, unless by "past experience" you mean biological
evolution in environments that structure energy, the necessary information
for perception is readily available from that structure (e.g., texture
gradients, kinetic optical occlusion).
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Stuart M
Hi Annette,
I would argue that both bottom-up and top-down work together and are both
ways of describing things from different perspectives. We assemble the
sensations into a whole--for example, in vision we assemble the size,
shape, movement (or lack thereof), color, and other components into a
co
Dear Tipsters,
I like D. O. Hebb's distinction between sensation and perception as a way of
distinguishing bottom-up and top-down processing.
Hebb defines sensation as activity in the sense organ and corresponding sensory
receiving areas of the brain. You can easily illustrate this with a diagr
I am having a bit of a hard time this year answering questions about bottom up
processing.
Student question: How can it be truly bottom up if it requires a comparison to
a stored image? Isn't that like top-down? You use the stored image to recognize
what it is that is coming in. How are these a
11 matches
Mail list logo
