RE: [tips] on STM

2016-08-24 Thread Miguel Roig
Mike, I have not been very active in TIPS in the past few years, but know that your latest post on STM is the 110th 'Mike Palij' post that I have purposely saved for reference purposes from the past couple of years alone. That's the time when I had to switched my TIPS subscription from my home e

[tips] Anyone Use This Website?

2016-08-24 Thread Mike Palij
There is a website that is maintained by a couple of people who teach psychology and one area is devoted to book reviews; see: http://booksforpsychologyclass.weebly.com/blog/moonwalking-with-einstein-the-art-and-science-of-remembering-everything Anyone familiar/use this website? Opinions? -Mike

Re: [tips] on STM

2016-08-24 Thread Terry L. Gottfried
Indeed, thanks, I didn’t know this. I’ll be adjusting my STM lectures accordingly. Terry On 8/24/16, 12:33 PM, "Mike Palij" wrote: >On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:47:27 -0700, Carol DeVolder wrote: >>I think one reason for the low response rate is that everyone is busy >>getting ready for the sta

Re: [tips] on STM

2016-08-24 Thread Mike Palij
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:47:27 -0700, Carol DeVolder wrote: I think one reason for the low response rate is that everyone is busy getting ready for the start of classes. I understand that but, c'mon, a simple response like "interesting" or "you're out of your freakin' mind" can be made quickly e

Re: [tips] on STM

2016-08-24 Thread Carol DeVolder
I think one reason for the low response rate is that everyone is busy getting ready for the start of classes. I read your post but was traveling and didn't have time to follow the links. It is difficult for me to let go of the 7 plus or minus 2 concept, but I suppose that's because I am relying on

Re: [tips] on STM

2016-08-24 Thread William Scott
Mike, I read your reply and said to myself "thanks for clearing that up, Mike. Now I don't have to write anything." I should have replied, "thanks for clearing that up, Mike" but I didn't want to sound sarcastic and I didn't know which emojee to attach. Thanks for clearing that up, Mike[??]

RE: [tips] on STM

2016-08-24 Thread Mike Palij
So, two days have passed and there has been no response to my post below. Now, I'm kind of curious as to why since the original poster asked about the magical number 7. Cowan and others have argued for the magical 4 (+/- 1) and one can add in the process of subsidizing into the mix. So, no opin