Two reactions: It is not so much the failure of peer review to consider the
true value of replications, but a failure of long-standing editorial/journal
policy, which is then passed down to referees. Also, wrt the blog, an editor
may not be able to compel an author to release his/her data, but i
Historically, on TiPS, we have shunned oversight of our posts.
And I fully and whole-heartedly agree with this.
HOWEVER, here is a problem and request.
I get the digest. One consequence is sometimes the prior thread is SO LONG
that I can't even tell where one old post ends and a new one begins.
