RE: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die

2017-11-26 Thread Stuart McKelvie
ing in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: Re: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die > On Nov 26, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Stuart McKelvie wrote: > > Recently, it has been argued that the crisis is past and that there is a > renaissance: > http://www.annualre

Re: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die

2017-11-26 Thread Christopher Green
> On Nov 26, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Stuart McKelvie wrote: > > Recently, it has been argued that the crisis is past and that there is a > renaissance: > http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836 Yeah, Stuart, maybe *their* crisis is past (since they started it, more

RE: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die

2017-11-26 Thread Stuart McKelvie
___ -Original Message- From: Miguel Roig [mailto:ro...@stjohns.edu] Sent: November-26-17 6:45 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: RE: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die To clarify, I had a fair amount of exposure to various

RE: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die

2017-11-26 Thread Miguel Roig
Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: Re: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die Theory was a central issue in my 70’s grad study, but I agree with Miguel that it seems un-explored. I do not recall much time given to it in my undergrad study, except perhaps, in History and Sy

RE: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die

2017-11-25 Thread Mike Palij
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 23:19:08 -0800, Jim Clark wrote: Hi Hi Jim and all, As a former Paivio student, I do not recall that Anderson's paper was taken to be definitive about the debate. My doctoral dissertation was on spatial problem solving, specifically, on whether the "alignment effect" (i.

Re: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die

2017-11-25 Thread Gerald L. Peterson
correct? Miguel From: Jim Clark [j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca<mailto:j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca>] Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2017 2:18 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: RE: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die Hi As a former Paivio student

RE: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die

2017-11-25 Thread Miguel Roig
t? Miguel From: Jim Clark [j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca] Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2017 2:18 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: RE: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die Hi As a former Paivio student, I do not recall that

RE: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die

2017-11-24 Thread Jim Clark
ttp://www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark> From: Michael Palij [mailto:m...@nyu.edu] Sent: November-24-17 10:14 PM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Cc: Michael Palij Subject: [tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die A recently published article in "Frontiers in Psychology" (

[tips] Consciousness Theory Is Where Science Goes to Die

2017-11-24 Thread Michael Palij
A recently published article in "Frontiers in Psychology" (word to the wise) by Oakley & Halligan argues that consciousness is an epiphenomenal by-product of an unconscious process called the "internal narrative". If this sounds familiar it may be because it is similar to the 1970s imagery debate.