Re: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon?

2013-04-15 Thread Jim Clark
Hi How about evidence-based teaching of psychology? http://dmmsclick.wileyeurope.com/view.asp?m=2ii3g11sk5hjmg7de8jau=198606f=h And can we soon expect evidence-based research practices? Take care Jim James M. Clark Professor Chair of Psychology j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca Room 4L41A 204-786-9757

RE: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon?

2013-04-15 Thread Stuart McKelvie
___ -Original Message- From: Jim Clark [mailto:j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca] Sent: April 15, 2013 10:33 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: Re: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon? Hi How about evidence-based teaching of psychology? http://dmmsclick.wileyeurope.com/view.asp?m

Re:[tips] The evidence based bandwagon

2013-04-13 Thread Mike Wiliams
Evidence-based practice and Standard of care are important concepts in medicine that are strongly related to Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code based reimbursement for health care services. If you do not provide an evidence-based standard of care, you will not get reimbursed for

re: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon?

2013-04-12 Thread Mike Palij
I find what you say below strange and bordering on the bizarre. Scott Lilienfeld probably should chime in if he has the time but in the meantime I suggest that one check out the Cochrane Collaboration website for background on evidence based methods See: www.cochrane.org and the Campbell

Re: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon?

2013-04-12 Thread Michael Britt
Frankly Mike I don't appreciate the use of or need for terms like bizarre and perverse. That's uncalled for. I'm making the observation that the term evidence-based is being bandied about without much thought as to what it truly means. I appreciate your links below and I'll check them out.

Re: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon?

2013-04-12 Thread Michael Britt
Apparently TIPS is no longer the place where professionals can have an open discussion of ideas without being criticized. I have used up my 3rd comment for the day. Perhaps it'll be a much longer time, if ever, before there will be another one. Michael A. Britt, Ph.D.

RE: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon?

2013-04-12 Thread Lilienfeld, Scott O
Hi Mike et aldon't have much time today (two graduate student defenses, plus meetings), but see the following reference for a brief history of the (evidence-based practice) EBP concept as applied to clinical psychology and allied fields: Spring, B. (2007). Evidence-based practice in

re: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon?

2013-04-12 Thread William Scott
Although evidence-based practice is certainly a nice ideal, it rarely occurs in most of the practices that try to follow that ideal. The reason is that all the evidence is not available. There have been many discussions of the file-drawer problem and small studies with lack of power on this

Re: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon?

2013-04-12 Thread Christopher Green
I think that evidence-based bandwagon is a perfectly marvellous phrase, but probably not for the reasons that Michael Britt's psychoanalyst friend thinks. The phrase evidence-based has, in many ways, outlived its usefulness because it has started to be picked up and (mis-)used by the very alt

Re: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon?

2013-04-12 Thread David Epstein
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Christopher Green went: In short, adopting your opponent's high-status vocabulary and then twisting it to your own purposes is an often successful diversionary tactic This reminds me, tangentially, of one of the most nefarious and effective presto-change-o tricks to have

Re: [tips] The evidence based bandwagon?

2013-04-12 Thread Paul Brandon
Not sure who officially controls the designation 'evidence based ', but the description can be used in two different ways. First, the treatment practice itself is supported by systematically gathered data. This assumes that the treatment as typically administered in the field does not differ