Re: [Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Am Sun, 17 Nov 2013 19:44:21 +0100 schrieb Ervin Hegedüs - HA2OS : > Hello Thomas, > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 06:58:27PM +0100, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > > Just saw it. I will pick up both files to tlf's master branch. > > right, thanks, > > > > It's a simply sort function, based on ascii t

Re: [Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread Ervin Hegedüs - HA2OS
Hello Thomas, On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 06:58:27PM +0100, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > Just saw it. I will pick up both files to tlf's master branch. right, thanks, > > It's a simply sort function, based on ascii table: > > http://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/datastructures.html > > (see the lis

Re: [Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Hi Ervin, Am Sun, 17 Nov 2013 18:40:45 +0100 schrieb Ervin Hegedüs - HA2OS : > Hello Thomas, > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 03:09:18PM +0100, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > > Hi Ervin, > > > > just had a look into it. Thanks for preparing. > > > > Please see my comment on the pull request. > > I've c

Re: [Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread Ervin Hegedüs - HA2OS
Hello Thomas, On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 03:09:18PM +0100, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > Hi Ervin, > > just had a look into it. Thanks for preparing. > > Please see my comment on the pull request. I've closed the pull request, > As the call master database has a different sorting order as > before ca

Re: [Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread FS
Hi Jim, could you correct to link on your webpage for TLF. Must be: www.country-files.com/cty/old/cty.dat Thanks, Fred On 11/17/2013 05:22 PM, FS wrote: Ok, if you update from cty-2310.zip you have to take cty.dat from the "old" directory. That is what you have to know. Unluckily there is direc

Re: [Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread Ervin Hegedüs - HA2OS
Hello Fred, On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 03:15:03PM +0100, Fred Siegmund wrote: > Ervin, > do you also see that Calls like TO2R dont get recognized by TLF > correctly. It seems to ignore Calls > after the "=". Also the different zones in one country like in the > USA dont get recognized (zone 5 vs 4) f

Re: [Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread FS
Ok, if you update from cty-2310.zip you have to take cty.dat from the "old" directory. That is what you have to know. Unluckily there is direct link on country-files.com to tlf like in the older days. ;-) 73 Fred On 11/17/2013 05:07 PM, Thomas Beierlein wrote: Hi Fred, For TO2R I get Reunion

Re: [Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Hi Fred, For TO2R I get Reunion Island with Ervins cty.dat. Seems to be ok. Am Sun, 17 Nov 2013 15:15:03 +0100 schrieb Fred Siegmund : > Ervin, > do you also see that Calls like TO2R dont get recognized by TLF > correctly. It seems to ignore Calls > after the "=". Maybe you are using the wron

Re: [Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Hi Ervin, just had a look into it. Thanks for preparing. Please see my comment on the pull request. As the call master database has a different sorting order as before can you please give me some more information about how you processed it? 73, de tom DL1JBE Am Sun, 17 Nov 2013 12:33:38 +0100

Re: [Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread Fred Siegmund
Ervin, do you also see that Calls like TO2R dont get recognized by TLF correctly. It seems to ignore Calls after the "=". Also the different zones in one country like in the USA dont get recognized (zone 5 vs 4) from cty.dat. I am not not sure if this a LF/CR problem of the file. 73 Fred Am 17

[Tlf-devel] New callmaster and cty.dat files

2013-11-17 Thread Ervin Hegedüs - HA2OS
Hello, I've collected the participiants of few last WW contests, and updated the callmaster file, which modified at 3 years ago about. The previous version of callmaster contains about 41000 callsigns, not it contains about 44000 - I think it's very relevant, because the number of participiants a