Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

Hi. Draft-17 submitted. Yoav > On 4 May 2017, at 23:09, Kathleen Moriarty > wrote: > > Yoav, > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Yoav Nir > wrote: >> >> On 4 May 2017, at 16:09, Kathleen Moriarty >>

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

Thanks! That would have been an embarrassing erratum. > On 5 May 2017, at 14:31, Hubert Kario wrote: > > On Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:59:29 CEST Yoav Nir wrote: >>> 2) In Section 6: >>> Server implementations SHOULD support all of the following cipher >>> suites, and

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

On Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:59:29 CEST Yoav Nir wrote: > > 2) In Section 6: > >Server implementations SHOULD support all of the following cipher > >suites, and client implementations SHOULD support at least one of > >them: > > > >o TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 > >o

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

Yoav, On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Yoav Nir wrote: > > On 4 May 2017, at 16:09, Kathleen Moriarty > wrote: > > I haven't approved it yet as I noticed there was no response (that I saw) to > Alexey's comment and no change in the draft as

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

> On 4 May 2017, at 16:09, Kathleen Moriarty > wrote: > > I haven't approved it yet as I noticed there was no response (that I saw) to > Alexey's comment and no change in the draft as a result of his comments. You mean these comments?

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

> On May 4, 2017, at 08:41, Hubert Kario wrote: > > On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 15:09:04 CEST Sean Turner wrote: >> All, >> >> draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis has been revised since it left the WG and we agree >> with Yoav’s statement at the mic in Chicago that the WG should review

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

I haven't approved it yet as I noticed there was no response (that I saw) to Alexey's comment and no change in the draft as a result of his comments. I'll wait in responses for these 2 items. Thank you, Kathleen Sent from my iPhone > On May 4, 2017, at 8:41 AM, Hubert Kario

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 15:09:04 CEST Sean Turner wrote: > All, > > draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis has been revised since it left the WG and we agree > with Yoav’s statement at the mic in Chicago that the WG should review the > changes before we ask Kathleen (our newly appointed AD) to continue >

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

Thanks to MT and Ben for their reviews. Joe and I have asked Kathleen to progress this draft towards the “approved” state. spt > On Apr 11, 2017, at 09:09, Sean Turner wrote: > > All, > > draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis has been revised since it left the WG and we agree > with

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

I have reviewed the changes. They look good. I have some reservations about section 7 (implementation status) given that I expect it to date badly, but it isn't really doing any actual harm either. On 11 Apr. 2017 11:09 pm, "Sean Turner" wrote: > All, > >