Re: FreeBSD jdk 1.2.2 alpha and Tomcat

I also use FreeBSD and jdk1.2.2 at home (an early version of the hand built port). It works just fine for Tomcat R&D at home, don't know about production. And I also have heard about GUI problems. Edward Wolpert wrote: > > I've got FBSD at home, and been trying to test the 1.2.2 port myself. > C

Re: VOTE: new commiter: Petr Jiricka

+1 Costin Manolache wrote: > > Hi again. > > Please vote for adding Petr Jiricka ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) > to the list of official commiters. He fixed a big number of bugs > in JSP and contributed many ideas in this area - including debugging, > etc. > > He has my +1 > > Costin > > ( I still u

Re: VOTE: new commiter

+1 Thanks for you contributions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > Please send your +1s for Vasile Gaburici. > He did a great work integrating tomcat with AOLServer, had many > contributions in the hardest part of tomcat ( the C code ), including an > amazing fix for JNI/Linux ( I spent many

[Fwd: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Embedded.java]

I forgot to give credit for this patch -- it was submitted by Christian Mallwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > craigmcc00/12/18 19:23:12 > > Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Engine.java >catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/sta

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Embedded.java

craigmcc00/12/18 19:23:12 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Engine.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Embedded.java Log: Enhance the example main() method in the Embedded class so that it will actually run. The "/examples" webapp does

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Jon Stevens wrote: > p.s. One thing that you are all not remembering or even realize is that > Catalina was originally going to be JServ 2.0. If Sun had never given us the > source code to Tomcat, then you would have been using Catalina anyway. I hope EVERYONE takes what Jon

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

kenneth topp wrote: > Hello, > > (another user here) > > If the difference were spoken as tc 3.x follows servlet 2.2/jsp 1.1 where > tc 4.x follows servlet2.3/jsp 1.2, then it's a clear difference that I > can appreciate, and even base decisions on. > For any previous version change in the serv

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

Hello, (another user here) If the difference were spoken as tc 3.x follows servlet 2.2/jsp 1.1 where tc 4.x follows servlet2.3/jsp 1.2, then it's a clear difference that I can appreciate, and even base decisions on. I decided to follow 3.2, as I felt that it was getting the most exercise then

Re: Yogi (Berra, not Bear): "It's deja vu all over again". :-)

Roy Wilson wrote: It's odd that Nacho suggested that a look at the thread he posted might be worthwhile. I've been lurking on this list for about 6 months (with an occasional attempt to contribute) and it seems like the TC3.x vs TC4 struggle is like a forest fire that keeps getting almost put out

Re: Yogi (Berra, not Bear): "It's deja vu all over again". :-)

on 12/18/2000 6:03 PM, "Roy Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it seems like the TC3.x vs TC4 struggle is like a forest fire that keeps > getting almost put out and then starts up again. Exactly. I want to finalize a decision on it. It is time to do so. -jon

Yogi (Berra, not Bear): "It's deja vu all over again". :-)

It's odd that Nacho suggested that a look at the thread he posted might be worthwhile. I've been lurking on this list for about 6 months (with an occasional attempt to contribute) and it seems like the TC3.x vs TC4 struggle is like a forest fire that keeps getting almost put out and then start

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

Henri Gomez wrote: > [snip] > > Tomcat 3.x or 4.x? That is the confusion that needs to be cleared up. > > The confusion will exist also for Apache 1.3 / 2.0. And this one will be much > more important. > It's actually pretty clear in the web server case. The active development is happening on 2

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

David Rees wrote: > Hi Craig, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Frankly, I am disappointed in the development process of > > Tomcat. I posted a > > > simple documentation patch (See bug report 528) two weeks ago > > for the FAQ

More Clarification

Ok, I just got off the phone with Pier (who just broke both of his thumbs skiing this weekend ouch) and he has clarified a bit of what Costin expressed to him about what he really wants to do, so let me repeat it to see if I got it right now: Costin wants to continue to work on 3.x HEAD a

Re: OpenEJB

on 12/18/2000 1:18 PM, "dferugson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anybody know if tomcat is headed in the direction of being a full ejb > app server? No, it isn't. www.ejboss.org is the right thing that you want and has integration with Tomcat. -jon -- Honk if you love peace and quiet.

OpenEJB

Anybody know if tomcat is headed in the direction of being a full ejb app server? -- Doug Ferguson Software Developer www.coremetrics.com 512-342-2623x212 512-619-9972(cell)

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Henri Gomez wrote: > The users will decide. Be fair, let them evaluate TC 3.3. Speaking as a user, this doesn't make sense. It's fine to compare two different products, but it doesn't make any sense to compare two different versions of the same product that are under

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

on 12/18/2000 2:47 PM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There will be Apache 1.3.x and Apache 2.0 sites around the world for many > time. > Why not TC 3.x and 4.x ? Feature development doesn't really seem to be happening on HTTPd 1.3.x. All of the primary developers are focused on 2.0

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

> Ok, so you are going to stop at 3.3 and then what? Abandon things? Hope > that > others pick things up? Move to Catalina? What are you going to do? Costin said he will continue to maintain the 3.3 base. But I think is that after such objections, he will not start a 3.4 tree (at least not under

BugRat Report #616 has been filed.

Bug report #616 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #616 Details. Project: Jasper Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: serious

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

Hi Jon, > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Of course not. That is why I'm suggesting to move away from it for the > future and opening the discussion of that now. Would you rather that we > continue to follow down this path of split trees forever? Would you rather > that all of ou

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

on 12/18/2000 1:36 PM, "James Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think Jon is going for the record to see how many developers and people of > good conscience he can alienate. I thank you for your opinion. I'm sorry if people feel alienated as that isn't my intention. > Costin, I appreciate al

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

- Original Message - From: "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I think Jon is going for the record to see how many developers and people of good conscience he can alienate. Costin, I appreciate all of the hard work you have done on the Tomcat project. You were pivotal in cleaning up a ra

example case of my hell

Ok, so the primary developer of 3.x disappears and now I'm the one that gets stuck answering the tech support emails and can't even give a good answer? No way am I going to support any decision towards that. I don't think that very many of you realize the amount of privately send support email th

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

on 12/18/2000 12:20 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see any need to go beyond 3.3 - and I said > many times I'll stop doing any major changes in the > core after 3.3 is done. I'll just fix bugs and develop > modules - most of them in my private, non-apache space > ( I'

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

on 12/18/2000 12:40 PM, "David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although I might point out that there seems to be at least one full time > paid employee on the project. :-) > > -Dave Costin is not paid to work on this project. -jon

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > There are no issues with porting to 4.0. I just took an app > developed on 3.x > and moved it to 4.0 without any problems. Maybe for your app it ported over, but for others (specifically those working with XML and parsers other than the one bundl

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

Paul Frieden wrote: > Not everybody is in a position to throw away their investment in the 3.x > series just yet. Absolutely true. That's why I went back and did 3.2, because I totally understand this reasoning. Some people can't even get off 3.1 yet, because Costin changed so much in 3.2 :-).

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

Hi Craig, > -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Frankly, I am disappointed in the development process of > Tomcat. I posted a > > simple documentation patch (See bug report 528) two weeks ago > for the FAQ > > included with the Tomcat 3.x and

BugRat Report #615 has been filed.

Bug report #615 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #615 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: serious

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

on 12/18/2000 11:47 AM, "David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It really is part of the same issue. Because Greg is not willing to jump to > 4.0, the idea of continuing development on the 3.x branch (work towards 3.3) > is welcome and reassuring. There will likely be some issues with porting

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

Jon ha escrito: > Please look at all the information available to you about > what is happening > before commenting again. To give people a chance to get a personal opinion let's go to the REAL start of this thread, a interesting exercise ( at least for me ) http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l

RE: WML Generation from JSP broken!!!!

Tom Reilly wrote, > So here's my proposal: > > JSP 1.2 engines have mime type mappings like so (or something > like this): > > *.jsp -> application/jsp > *.jspx -> application/jsp-xml > > And documents of type application/jsp and application/jspx (or > whatever names we decide on) are handled app

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

David Rees wrote: > > Frankly, I am disappointed in the development process of Tomcat. I posted a > simple documentation patch (See bug report 528) two weeks ago for the FAQ > included with the Tomcat 3.x and posted a couple messages about it. I > haven't heard a thing about it and saw the rele

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

> -Original Message- > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > on 12/18/2000 10:01 AM, "Greg Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As a use of Tomcat 3.1 on several production machines, may I > say "thanks" also > > to > > Costin and everyone else who supports 3.1 (and 3.1.1, 3

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

on 12/18/2000 11:27 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In fact, 3.3 doesn't even exist - when the development > on the main branch of tomcat 3 will reach a stable > state we can discuss about 3.3 , and you can argue > that it's better or worse than 3.2 and we should ( or > should

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

> I wish people would pay more attention to what the > overall issues are > instead of focusing on entirely the wrong things. +1 on this > The issue is the idea of a 3.3 and I'm not saying to > "jump" to 4.0. I don't see how did you created a "3.3" issue - tomcat3.x development continues as i

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

> I don't agree. TC3.3 is a rewrite of TC3.2, with all > of the TC4 "fancy features" (and some more). 3.3 is not a "rewrite" of 3.2 - some code was moved for better organization and modularity, and we finished a number of optimizations that were started during 3.2 development. Yes, a lot of cod

BugRat Report #614 has been filed.

Bug report #614 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #614 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Feature Requests SubCategory: New Feature Class: swbug State: received Priority: low Severity: non-crit

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

on 12/18/2000 10:01 AM, "Greg Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a use of Tomcat 3.1 on several production machines, may I say "thanks" also > to > Costin and everyone else who supports 3.1 (and 3.1.1, 3.2, 3.2.1, etc.) We > are > in no position to jump to 4.0 just because its trendy and ha

Re: stupid question on array return by javax.servlet.request.X509Certificateattribute

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Why the attribute 'javax.servlet.request.X509Certificate' return an array of X509Certificate. I don't understand how it's possible because when my client choose an certificate, he chooses only one... For my test array contain always one element... so is it an specificat

RE: stupid question on array return by javax.servlet.request.X509Certificateattribute

The idea (I think) is to have the certificate chain in there. Your client certificate is signed by some authority which may, in turn, be signed by someone else and so on... So you could get your client certificate as the first element, the one who signed his certificate as the second and so on.

Re: WML Generation from JSP broken!!!!

Works for me. Every mime-type usually lays claim to a default suffix or two and we should definitely pick one and say that there is an implicit mapping for that prefix. So if I name my pages jspx then I don't have to worry about setting any mappings to get a JSP container to interpret the page

Re: Apache 2.0

Wow. That was fast. I am in the middle of compiling Apache 2.0 on locus so that we can run it with locus's config file on port 8080. I expect we will release the alpha on Friday unless something goes wrong, Once I have Apache running on port 8080 on locus, we can work on getting mod_jk install

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

> * The good point with TC 4.0 are all the good things inside (JMX, JAXP > 1.0/1.1) > The bad point on TC 4.0 are all these good things (JMX, JAXP 1.0/1.1). > > You have seens the thread on '[PROPOSAL] building is easy'. We need too > many > things now to build TC 4.0. You need JAXP, JSSE a

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

As a use of Tomcat 3.1 on several production machines, may I say "thanks" also to Costin and everyone else who supports 3.1 (and 3.1.1, 3.2, 3.2.1, etc.) We are in no position to jump to 4.0 just because its trendy and has more "development activity"... Thanks again, -Greg Bailey Paul Frieden

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

Not everybody is in a position to throw away their investment in the 3.x series just yet. While its fun to try the latest and greatest, not everybody can do that. Craig, is java.sun.com running on Tomcat 4.0? Jon, is www.apache.org running Apache 2.0 yet? When do you think they will be ready t

Re: Apache 2.0

Hi, I am able to compile Apache2.0, and I updated mod_jk for the modified functions in 2.0 - it now compiles. I'm pretty confident we can have it running in few days - it did worked before and it works fine with other multithreaded servers. As you can see, most of the code in mod_jk is indpenden

BugRat Report #613 has been filed.

Bug report #613 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #613 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical C

Re:Enterprise Tomcat

I am using Tomcat as the enterprise servlet container in production for our B2B E-Commerce servlet and several intranet applications at Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. I'm using the ISAPI filter and an SSL connection to IIS. The URL is only for our distributors to use, but you can hit the login se

stupid question on array return by javax.servlet.request.X509Certificateattribute

Why the attribute 'javax.servlet.request.X509Certificate' return an array of X509Certificate. I don't understand how it's possible because when my client choose an certificate, he chooses only one... For my test array contain always one element... so is it an specification to anticipate the futu

Apache/Tomcat 3.2.1 session error - help!

Hi, i still have my problem using tomcat 3.2.1 (release) with apache. Sessions are mixed up when calling the same servlet but using get/post method (get calls post and the other way around). Problem only arises when using tomcat with apache - not when using tomcat standalone. Any hints? Che

Re:X509 client certificate (please take a look at this)

I tried as Jerome Camilleri did and I can say that it doesn't work. I also tried to use java.security.cert.X509Certificate but it returns a null reference!:( In fact it's not requesting any certificate from my browser. (I'm using Netscape 4.73 and 6.0). TIA, Alexandre. On Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11

RE: [PATCH] Saving sessions across tomcat instances (#1)

Agree. How do I configure wincvs to give me file with differences. How do I configure wincvs to do diff -u ? (default is -w) ? --Shai -Original Message- From: Nacho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 16:48 To: 'tomcat-dev' Subject: RE: [PATCH] Saving sessions acro

RE: [PATCH] Saving sessions across tomcat instances (#1)

Hola Shai: IMHO your patch very interesting, i want use it on my own ( prior to commit it after a review by people ).. In mean time, please send patches as attached files, not embedded in a message, and another silly advice, please please dont send messages in HTML, for the people that have big

RE: TC 4.0 m5 and mod_warp

Just to continue : The jsession is written on URL : http://localhost/examples/servlet/SessionExample;jsessionid=B0B0D1E98495F533 D57255B4F1952436

TC 4.0 m5 and mod_warp

Hi, Just tested TC 4.0 m5 and mod_warp from my RPMs. In my httpd.conf : ... LoadModule ssl_module lib/apache/libssl.so LoadModule perl_modulelib/apache/libperl.so LoadModule dav_module lib/apache/libdav.so LoadModule webapp_modulelib/apache/mod_webapp

TOMCAT 3.2.1 STANDALONE AND SSL: Error reading request

Hi,   sorry for my mail into this group, but the user group seems to be dead since the 19th of November and we got an urgent SSL problem:   I'm currently stuck with my SSL enabling of tomcat 3.2 with a weird error message. As soon as I try to access SSL secured content, the following error o

about the socket error

tomcat-dev,hi! I have the tomcat is version 3.1 with own webserver,with the request 'rise,we can find the socket error and stop automic when want to restart tomcat,it can not restart,we should restart the computer and then we can start the tomcat again.I hear that should modify the Http

Re: jsp - html speedup

cga wrote: > > Hi there, > > I was thinking "There is a way to speed up jps". I mean if I take out > white spaces and other unnecesary text out of the html part of a jsp, the > server will send less bytes to the browser so it will be faster. > > I am pretending to do a Reader that take

Re: Suggestion for Mailing list page

Jon Stevens typed the following on 10:21 15/12/2000 -0800 >btw, how did you like the jakarta-site2 process of working with the system >for building the site? was it easy? is there anything i can improve to make >it better for you? It was a snap! Kief --- bitBull makes the Internet

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

I definitely agree with Henry & Costin... Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega

RE:RE: Réf. : RE: X509 client certificate (Mr. McClanahan, please take alook at this)

The type is javax.servlet.request.X509Certificate[] ?? ie an array not a single instance.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 18/12/2000 05:03:48 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Ken X Horn) Subject: RE:RE: Réf. : RE: X509 client certificate (

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

>It really scares me that you are the only person (as far as I >can tell) that >is seriously interested in maintaining and developing Tomcat >3.x into the >future. It is not good to have the entire rest of the core >developers work >on Tomcat 4.x and having you sit here and say that you are >g

BugRat Report #610 has been filed.

Bug report #610 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #610 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical C

RE:RE: Réf. : RE: X509 client certificate (Mr. McClanahan, please take alook at this)

Excuse for my determination but my problem was not solve... After change my serveur.xml to clientAuth="true"  like Craig R. McClanahan said, I fall again on my first exception when I try to extract the certificate request because object associate with ùrequest attributes nameés 'javax.servlet.

BugRat Report #609 has been filed.

Bug report #609 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #609 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: non-crit

BugRat Report #608 has been filed.

Bug report #608 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #608 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: non-crit

BugRat Report #607 has been filed.

Bug report #607 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #607 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: non-crit

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

Hi Jon, First, I want to thank you for the advices and your mail - even if I don't like what you say I do believe that your mail have some good things for me. > It really scares me that you are the only person (as > far as I can tell) that is seriously interested in ?> maintaining and developing

error in session management when using apache/tomcat 3.2.1 Release

Hi everybody, i posted a few times earlier ... but now i hope that found the source of the error (till yet without solution). I am using a servlet which calls itself from the get to the post method. A user is identified via sesion (quite usual i think) When using tomcat via 8080 port everything