Re: Common Session code 3.3/4.0 (was: [VOTE] New Committer: Kief Morris)

2001-02-07 Thread Kief Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed the following on 02:07 PM 2/6/2001 -0800 ( +2 if he also ports them to tomcat 3.3 or makes them independent of the container architecture - i.e. general purpose utils for serialization/deserialization with a simple adapter for each server :-) Sure, the 3.3 code could

[PATCH] Makefile

2001-02-07 Thread jean-frederic clere
Hi, The Makefile in jakarta-tomcat-4.0/connectors are broken. I have fixed them. Find enclosed the patch. Cheers Jean-frederic ? Makedefs ? patch.txt ? apache-1.3/.libs Index: Makefile === RCS file:

RE: [PATCH] Makefile

2001-02-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Did you succeed using the web_app connector ? I still have the same problem with cookies... La prise de conscience de votre propre ignorance est un grand pas vers la connaissance. -- Benjamin Disraeli -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Re: [PATCH] Makefile

2001-02-07 Thread jean-frederic clere
GOMEZ Henri wrote: Did you succeed using the web_app connector ? Not yet! I still have the same problem with cookies... La prise de conscience de votre propre ignorance est un grand pas vers la connaissance. -- Benjamin Disraeli -Original Message- From: jean-frederic

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper CommandLineContext.java

2001-02-07 Thread cmanolache
The new jasper makes it very easy to find and view the java source for a translated jsp page, it is located in work/somehost/someapp/some/context/path/MyJSP.java. Does it not seem logical to assign a package to the MyJSP class based on all or part of the above path?

ServletContext.getRealPath(string)

2001-02-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, In Turbine I wanted to provide an easy way to give all classes in a webapp easy access to the real path to the webapp: someone on the Turbine list mentioned that ServletContext.getRealPath(path) is not required to be implemented. If this is the case what is the best way to provide access to

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper CommandLineContext.java

2001-02-07 Thread Steve Downey
Placing all generated servlet classes into the same package only works if the loader cooperates. If the container does not use a separate, special, classloader for each page, it will not be able to distinguish the different instances of MyJSP.class, or in my case of index.class. That implies

Re: ServletContext.getRealPath(string)

2001-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, In Turbine I wanted to provide an easy way to give all classes in a webapp easy access to the real path to the webapp: someone on the Turbine list mentioned that ServletContext.getRealPath(path) is not required to be implemented. If this is the case what is the

JDBC - Tomcat with JSDK Enterprise Edition

2001-02-07 Thread BOON PING LIM
Tomcat-Apache is my choice to implement JSP. i wish to u JDBC-ODBC bridge to link database with JSP pages. i were told that JDK 1.3 standard edition does not support JDBC, therefore, i have installed "j2sdkee-1_2_1-win" -- JSDK enterprise edition. However, the below problem occurs '

Re: JDBC - Tomcat with JSDK Enterprise Edition

2001-02-07 Thread Jon Stevens
on 2/7/01 10:24 AM, "BOON PING LIM" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomcat-Apache is my choice to implement JSP. i wish to u JDBC-ODBC bridge to link database with JSP pages. i were told that JDK 1.3 standard edition does not support JDBC, therefore, i have installed "j2sdkee-1_2_1-win" -- JSDK

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper CommandLineContext.java

2001-02-07 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Steve Downey wrote: Placing all generated servlet classes into the same package only works if the loader cooperates. If the container does not use a separate, special, classloader for each page, it will not be able to distinguish the different instances of MyJSP.class, or in my case of

Bug?[Tomcat 3.2.1] Or am I missing something...

2001-02-07 Thread Mel Martinez
Hi, I'm not sure what I'm missing here, but I'm running into a strange bit of behavior in Tomcat 3.2.1. I've got a jsp that uses classes in a jar file that is placed in the WEB-INF/lib folder like so: webapps/demo/simple.jsp webapps/demo/WEB-INF/lib/mylib.jar Early on one of the classes

Re: Bug?[Tomcat 3.2.1] Or am I missing something...

2001-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Mel Martinez wrote: Hi, I'm not sure what I'm missing here, but I'm running into a strange bit of behavior in Tomcat 3.2.1. I've got a jsp that uses classes in a jar file that is placed in the WEB-INF/lib folder like so: webapps/demo/simple.jsp webapps/demo/WEB-INF/lib/mylib.jar

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.2.2

2001-02-07 Thread marcsaeg
marcsaeg01/02/07 15:24:57 Added: .Tag: tomcat_32 RELEASE-PLAN-3.2.2 Log: First draft of the proposed release plan for Tomcat 3.2.2 Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.1 +67 -0

[PROPOSAL] Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan

2001-02-07 Thread Marc Saegesser
We have collected quite a few good bug fixes on the tomcat_32 branch since the release of Tomcat 3.2.1. I propose that we make a public release of the tomcat_32 branch as Tomcat 3.2.2. A proposed release plan can be found at

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java

2001-02-07 Thread keith
keith 01/02/07 15:49:45 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java Log: Add the WebDAV ACL method. Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server/Ajp13.java Index: Ajp13.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/doc AJPv13.html

2001-02-07 Thread keith
keith 01/02/07 15:51:07 Modified:src/doc AJPv13.html Log: Document the added ACL method. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/AJPv13.html Index: AJPv13.html === RCS

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan

2001-02-07 Thread Jon Stevens
on 2/7/01 3:34 PM, "Marc Saegesser" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and comment on the proposed release plan. I will call release plan vote in the near future. +0 if and only if (ie: not -1) the following is modified to state: "Any bug introduced after Tomcat 3.2.1 MUST be fixed."

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common jk_ajp13.c

2001-02-07 Thread keith
keith 01/02/07 15:47:15 Modified:src/native/mod_jk/common jk_ajp13.c Log: Add the ACL method to ajpv13 (see http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-webdav-acl-04.txt) Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +7 -3

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.2.2

2001-02-07 Thread marcsaeg
marcsaeg01/02/07 17:05:35 Modified:.Tag: tomcat_32 RELEASE-PLAN-3.2.2 Log: Updated release criteria to include Bugzilla resolution requirements. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.2 +8 -6

Tomcat alias in tomcat standalone SSL

2001-02-07 Thread Barbara Nelson
I'm trying to integrate Tomcat 3.2.1 with my application, and have modified the implementation of SSLSocketFactory to use my keystore and trust manager. I have a certificate in my keystore, but it has a different alias (not tomcat) and I cannot change the alias. Where in the tomcat source code

RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan

2001-02-07 Thread Marc Saegesser
How about the following: Any bug introduced by a code change since Tomcat 3.2.1 was released MUST be fixed. If it worked in 3.2.1 it will work in 3.2.2. All Bugzilla items opened against "Tocmat 3" must be marked as RESOLVED. Those items that are not going to be fixed in Tomcat 3.2.2 will be

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader StandardClassLoader.java

2001-02-07 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/02/07 17:58:07 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader StandardClassLoader.java Log: Add some additional debugging instrumentation to assist in locating the "package sealing violation" exception problem. Revision Changes

Re: Status Report: Sealing Violation Problems With Xerces

2001-02-07 Thread James Duncan Davidson
on 2/7/01 6:05 PM, Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those interested in the gory details, the problem is in StandardClassLoader.findClass(), which delegates to the parent class loader prior to checking the local repositories (I'm not sure this is really correct behavior --

Re: Is it legal to have multiple taglib setter methods for the same property

2001-02-07 Thread Maya Muchnik
Why you cannot use only one setter "public setIndex (String index)" and then inside check if the string is convertable to integer or not? This way your index can represent a number or "all". "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: Alex Tang wrote: Thanks for the quick reply Craig. A followup

Re: Is it legal to have multiple taglib setter methods for the same property

2001-02-07 Thread Alex Tang
Maya Muchnik wrote: Why you cannot use only one setter "public setIndex (String index)" and then inside check if the string is convertable to integer or not? This way your index can represent a number or "all". In Tocmat 3.x, your suggestion works if the tag looks like:

Re: Is it legal to have multiple taglib setter methods for the same property

2001-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Alex Tang wrote: Thanks for the quick reply Craig. A followup question. In tomcat 3.1, I was able to do public setIndex ( Object o ) If this is legal, I can do my own internal checking to see if the object "o" is a String or an int. However in Tomcat 4.0, I get an error when I

Re: Is it legal to have multiple taglib setter methods for the same property

2001-02-07 Thread Pierre Delisle
Alex, Until the expert group rules on this, one workaround (that will always work) is to simply do the following (assuming a property of type Object): instead of: mytags:foo bar="abc"/ use: mytags:foo bar='%="abc"%'/ Another way is to define a PropertyEditor associated