Bill Barker wrote:
Firstly, let me add my +1 to the proposal. tomcat-dev could use more
warm-and-fuzzies. ;-)
Thanks :)
I have been following the discussion regarding the Tomcat 5 proposal.
I have some general comments.
Improve Performance Goal:
I agree with Chritopher that in order to
Remy Maucherat wrote:
For the transaction stuff to work properly, don't you need a valve also
to bind/unbind the Tyrex context ?
Hmm, not sure exactly what you mean here (sorry :-). I think you are referring
to the fact
that the transaction is bound to the current thread, and what if the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jfclere 2002/06/22 03:19:04
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper Constants.java
Log:
Typo
Submitted by: Ian Darwin, ian at darwinsys.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1 -1
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/Constants.java
Bill Barker wrote:
I agree with Remy
that any single benchmark suite isn't going to tell you how your particular
web-app will perform.
Bill,
Actually, I agree, but this isn't what that is :-)
There's a difference between:
a) Benchmarks for users that compare the performance of
jfclere 2002/06/22 09:19:46
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config project.xml
Added: webapps/tomcat-docs/config connectors.xml
Log:
Add some general information about the jakarta-tomcat-connectors.
Submitted by: Ian Darwin, ian at darwinsys.com
Revision Changes
jfclere 2002/06/22 09:47:55
Modified:jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
TldLocationsCache.java
Log:
Prevent nullpointerexception when wrong configuration.
Submitted by: Ian Darwin ian at darwinsys.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +4
jfclere 2002/06/22 09:57:54
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Typo
Submitted by: Ian Darwin ian at darwinsys.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c
Index: jk_worker_lb.c
I keep having that feeling you don't even know what Avalon is.
You just don't like them or something like that. Did you consider
you could have something to learn from them?
Just asking!
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
Tomcat 5 isn't some sort of generic server framework, it's
the reference implementation for the 2.4 spec. The spec is
central.
Servlet 2.4 will probably go to public draft pretty soon, so you'll be
able to see for yourself -- but I can
Costin,
If those variable declaration problems are fixed, I'll release a new
4.1.6 milestone as soon as I can fix the JNDI problems.
Not yet...
I attached the failed jsp.
Costin
[...]
%@ page language=java %
%@
- Original Message -
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 7:22 AM
Subject: Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0
-1 At this time for starting work on Tomcat 5 (jakarta-tomcat-5)
How about if the proposal were
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea what number to put in the proposal. As fast as
3.3 ? Faster than resin ?
It is not _that_ hard...
Pier (who will comment about Tomcat 5 in August)
--
[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
Tomcat 5 isn't some sort of generic server framework, it's
the reference implementation for the 2.4 spec. The spec is
central.
Servlet 2.4 will probably go to public draft pretty
- Original Message -
From: Christopher K. St. John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 6:36 AM
Subject: Re: Proposal draft for Tomcat 5.0 : benchmarks
Bill Barker wrote:
I agree with Remy
that any single benchmark suite isn't going to tell you
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
As far as I would like to see WARP and its future development, it'll
probably end up following a different container architecture. The
extenization of the HTTP stack from the core of the container brings some
advantages to the
Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Remy that any single benchmark suite isn't going to tell you how
your particular web-app will perform.
For sure in a web-app there are way too many variables to consider... The
only thing, though, that we have to measure is not that
billbarker2002/06/22 20:32:31
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/generators
StaticInterceptor.java
Log:
Experimental support for 2.3 style mapped-welcome files.
This of off be default, and probably uses too many recorces if you have more than
19 matches
Mail list logo
