Re: [PROPOSAL] Have Bootstrap and BootsrapService share startup/shutdowncode

2002-08-28 Thread jean-frederic clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > >>>Are you ok with a change for daemon to use introspection, and remove the >>>dependency from tomcat to daemon plus consolidate all startups ? >> >>Sure ;-) > > > Ok, then let me push a bit more: are you ok with

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:12 PM Subject: Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > > > > I think the decision to use the Host header is right, but >

Re: tomcat crashes

2002-08-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
Quoting Taral Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > But same thing works with different solaris. Here I have solaris 5.7 and > with 5.8 it works fine, even in one of 5.7 solaris machine tomcat runs fine. And they all have the same patches applied? I don't use Solaris, so I can't tell you specifically what

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12113] - Log4J ConsoleAppender & System.out.println do not display on console

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: tomcat crashes

2002-08-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
One more thing - check if the OS has all the relevant patches. Sometimes it's the libraries that JDK's using. Bojan Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Quoting Taral Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Try a different JDK. This doesn't look a Tomcat problem. > > Bojan > > > Hi > > > > I

Re: tomcat crashes

2002-08-28 Thread Taral Shah
But same thing works with different solaris. Here I have solaris 5.7 and with 5.8 it works fine, even in one of 5.7 solaris machine tomcat runs fine. I checked with memory and space, initially it showed that it had occupied 99% of disk space, so i moved whole code to another partition and there

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > So: getServerPort() should return the same as the CGI variable SERVER_PORT > ( which returns the server port, not the host header ! ), meaning the > value of the part after : in the Host header. > > I didn't know that the servlet spec can define new meanings for the

Re: tomcat crashes

2002-08-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
Quoting Taral Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Try a different JDK. This doesn't look a Tomcat problem. Bojan > Hi > > I am facing strange problem at one of my customers side. > I am using tomcat 3.3 for my devlopment and its working fine. > > But at one of customers side tomcat crases unknowingly.

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread costinm
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > > I think the decision to use the Host header is right, but > > I agree that it violates the wording in the servlet spec. > > > > The SERVER_PORT and the port in the Host: header are different > > beasts - in most use cases I've seen the user is intereste

JSP include after redirect. Spec. or bug?

2002-08-28 Thread Hugh J. L.
Hi, <% response.sendRedirect("b.jsp"); String left_page="c.jsp"; %> Running on Tomcat 4, it is ok. Running on Tomcat 3.3, the result is correct but there is error message on console. Of course, the include in this example is meaningless, but this jsp is extracted from large jsp file from client

tomcat crashes

2002-08-28 Thread Taral Shah
Hi I am facing strange problem at one of my customers side. I am using tomcat 3.3 for my devlopment and its working fine. But at one of customers side tomcat crases unknowingly. It even does not compile a simple jsp. The os at the client side is solaris, WHen tomcat starts and a simple jsp(conta

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
Quoting Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Not anymore. ;-) In the current 2.4 spec draft it is required to be taken > from the Host header. Huh, I guess that's that then. The bug does seem to be valid. At least according to the newer spec. Bojan --

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime ExpressionEvaluatorImpl.java PageContextImpl.java

2002-08-28 Thread horwat
horwat 2002/08/28 19:04:22 Modified:jasper2/lib jsp20el.jar jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime ExpressionEvaluatorImpl.java PageContextImpl.java Log: EL package renaming to avoid potential JSTL 1.0 conflict. Revision Changes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12101] - SecurityManager + unprivileged call to getParameter() = Security Violation

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12101] - SecurityManager + removal of sample webapps = unprivileged getParameter()!

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors

2002-08-28 Thread Steve Downey
My understanding is that this is really a client issue, rather than server. By the time a connector gets it, it's too late to do much about it. A little bit of research indicates that the user agents I have about will put the IP address in the Host header if the URI is specified by IP. That see

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12129] - The JSP generated servlets have bad package directories

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12147] New: - session logout() method does not invalidate the session

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:01 PM Subject: Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > I think the decision to use the Host header is right, but > I agree that it violates the wording in the ser

Re: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors]

2002-08-28 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Ryan Lubke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:00 PM Subject: Re: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors] > On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 17:32, Bill Barker wrote: > > > > - Original Message

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config jk.xml

2002-08-28 Thread glenn
glenn 2002/08/28 17:32:39 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config jk.xml Log: Note those features which are Apache 1.3 only Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/jk.xml Index: jk.xml =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12113] - Log4J ConsoleAppender & System.out.println do not display on console

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12128] - JSP Comment end symbol not recognized in some cases

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servletJspServletWrapper.java

2002-08-28 Thread Kin-Man Chung
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:41:16 -0700 (PDT) > From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServletWrapper.java > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > On 28 Aug 2002 [EMAIL P

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread costinm
I think the decision to use the Host header is right, but I agree that it violates the wording in the servlet spec. The SERVER_PORT and the port in the Host: header are different beasts - in most use cases I've seen the user is interested in the second. Note that a load balancer or proxy is requ

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12145] - [PATCH] AccessLogValve - %{xxx}i implementation

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12145] New: - [PATCH] AccessLogValve - %{xxx}i implementation

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspReader.java

2002-08-28 Thread kinman
kinman 2002/08/28 16:58:18 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag: tomcat_4_branch JspReader.java Log: - Fixed 12128 Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.5.2.2 +4

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspReader.java

2002-08-28 Thread kinman
kinman 2002/08/28 16:50:10 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspReader.java Log: - Fixed 12128: <%-- ---%> is a valid comment Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +4 -1 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspReader.java

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servletJspServletWrapper.java

2002-08-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 28 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - Fixed 11485: recompilation of jsp files when TLD is modified. Cool! This change (and wasn't there another recent change to auto-detect changes in files included via <%@ include %>?) will definitely reduce user confusion. Now if I had this one in

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 04:28, Bill Barker wrote: > The question in 12052 is whether Apache should use the socket port (as it > does now), or the port in the Host header. When this came up with the > Coyote/Http11 connector, the decision was that the Host header was the > correct one. I'd have to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12046] - Reloading of tag files when modified

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 02:14, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > Consider Apache running on port 80, forwarding to Tomcat on 8009 (the > default setup). I think it's reasonable for the application developer to > assume that getServerPort() is going to return 80 and not 8009, because > they should conce

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread costinm
On 28 Aug 2002, Ryan Lubke wrote: > > 1) For me after ( another ) reading of rfc2616, from the point you named > > and following the references given there, i've found that in 5.2 seems > > to say that a empty Host: header must be responded by 400 because empty > > it is not a valid Host name.. >

Re: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors]

2002-08-28 Thread Ryan Lubke
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 17:32, Bill Barker wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Ryan Lubke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "tcdev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:43 AM > Subject: [Fwd: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors] > > > > By the way the quote was pu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11485] - Jasper2 caches tag library descriptors too long

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServletWrapper.java

2002-08-28 Thread kinman
kinman 2002/08/28 16:00:19 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java Generator.java JspDocumentParser.java PageInfo.java Parser.java ParserController.java TagFileProcessor.java TagLibraryI

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Ryan Lubke
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 17:05, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > De: Ryan Lubke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 20:29 > > Para: Tomcat Developers List > > Asunto: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > > > > > > > > > The port MUST be the one in the Host Header if one is >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12142] - Can not use requset.getContextPath in error page path

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Manager application under Apache + Mod_webapp + Tomcat

2002-08-28 Thread Prasad Tadi
Hi, I think we can't use the Manager application thro' Apache's mod_webapp mechanism... Ref: http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg29630.html Point #4 I have configured a single Apache server and 4 tomcat ( Webapp connector + http connectors only). All the 4 instances of t

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Validator.java

2002-08-28 Thread luehe
luehe 2002/08/28 15:02:11 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Validator.java Log: Simplified custom tag validation by replacing call to getJspAttribute() with the constructor of Node.JspAttribute directly (for named attributes). Revision ChangesPath

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12142] New: - Can not use requset.getContextPath in error page path

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper gump3.xml

2002-08-28 Thread bobh
bobh2002/08/28 14:53:03 Added: .gump3.xml Log: - similar to gump2.xml, but this uses the cvs HEAD to build jasper (for TC5) Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/gump3.xml Index: gump3.xml ===

Re: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors]

2002-08-28 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Ryan Lubke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "tcdev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: [Fwd: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors] > By the way the quote was pulled from section 14.23 of RFC 2616. > > =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12141] New: - ISAPI Redirector steals IIS Request.

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: Ryan Lubke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 20:29 > Para: Tomcat Developers List > Asunto: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > > > > > The port MUST be the one in the Host Header if one is > present,and should > > be present if the request is HTTP1.1 compliant,

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Costin Manolache
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: >> De: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 15:27 >> Para: Tomcat Dev List >> Asunto: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > >> of load balancers and firewalls, so it is unrealistic to expect to >> return port numbers that it doesn't know a

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Costin Manolache
Ryan Lubke wrote: > >> The port MUST be the one in the Host Header if one is present,and should >> be present if the request is HTTP1.1 compliant, >> > What if the Host header is supplied, but the value is empty. This seems > legal per section 14.23 of the HTTP/1.1 RFC? It is legal in the cas

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12140] New: - Administration webapp does not start - cant load struts.jar

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [4.1.10-dev] Jasper 2 problems

2002-08-28 Thread Jan Luehe
Remy, > I'm testing 4.1.10-dev before tagging, and I ran into some serious problems. > > Jasper 2 seems broken (in the TC 4 branch; the HEAD/TC 5 branch may be > broken as well, but I didn't have time to test it), and fails to compile > most pages from the admin webapp. my apologies! When bac

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java

2002-08-28 Thread luehe
luehe 2002/08/28 13:47:57 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag: tomcat_4_branch Generator.java Log: Applied change that I had overlooked when backporting fix from Tomcat 5 Revision ChangesPath No revision

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread costinm
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > If you run Tomcat behind Apache using JK, the entire combination is the > "container" from the perspective of the servlet specification. The entire > combination has to meet all the spec rules or it's not compliant. > > The fact that the servlet

Re: an httpclient question

2002-08-28 Thread Zhenxin wang
Thanks, Craig I think I have figured it out. --Zhenxin - Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:44 PM Subject: Re: an httpclient question > > > On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Zhenxin wan

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/compressionFilters CompressionServletResponseWrapper.java

2002-08-28 Thread Amy Roh
Can anyone with access to jakarta-servletapi-5 apply the same patch to jakarta-servletapi-5/jsr154/examples/WEB-INF/classes/compressionFilters/CompressionServletResponseWrapper.java? Thanks, Amy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > amyroh 2002/08/28 11:35:35 > > Modified:webapps/examples/WEB-I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12135] New: - servlets-examples application does not get started up

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11910] - Bugs in example CompressionServletResponseWrapper

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/compressionFilters CompressionServletResponseWrapper.java

2002-08-28 Thread amyroh
amyroh 2002/08/28 11:35:35 Modified:webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/compressionFilters CompressionServletResponseWrapper.java Log: Add support other content-types. Fixes bug 11910. Patch submitted by "Peter Rajsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Revision Ch

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Ryan Lubke
> The port MUST be the one in the Host Header if one is present,and should > be present if the request is HTTP1.1 compliant, > What if the Host header is supplied, but the value is empty. This seems legal per section 14.23 of the HTTP/1.1 RFC? > > Saludos , > Ignacio J. Ortega > > > > ---

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.tomcat.devel To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:36 AM Subject: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > John Trollinger wrote: > > > > I can agree that mod_jk can be seen a

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 15:27 > Para: Tomcat Dev List > Asunto: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > of load balancers and firewalls, so it is unrealistic to expect to > return port numbers that it doesn't know about. What do you think? > > http

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, John Trollinger wrote: > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:21:26 -0400 > From: John Trollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > > > > > -Ori

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11829] - Unable to use Property editors with jsp:attribute

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java

2002-08-28 Thread luehe
luehe 2002/08/28 10:57:13 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java Log: Fixed 11829 ("Unable to use Property editors with jsp:attribute") Revision ChangesPath 1.82 +11 -10 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/co

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:03:34 -0700 (PDT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, John T

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Costin Manolache
John Trollinger wrote: > I can agree that mod_jk can be seen as part of the servlet container, > but > I wonder how you are going to "fake" tomcat into thinking the request > came from > port 80 when it really came from port 8009 and what other implication / > assumptions > would occur because

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread John Trollinger
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:04 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, John Trollinger wrote: > > > > Consider Apache running on port 80, f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7613] - session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5507] - Swapping sessions causes exceptions and it doesn't work with FileStore

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session StoreBase.java PersistentManagerBase.java

2002-08-28 Thread bobh
bobh2002/08/28 10:08:58 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session StoreBase.java PersistentManagerBase.java Log: Currently when backup's of sessions expire they take out the session in RAM along with them. This patch fixes this problem.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Have Bootstrap and BootsrapService share startup/shutdowncode

2002-08-28 Thread cmanolache
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Are you ok with a change for daemon to use introspection, and remove the > > dependency from tomcat to daemon plus consolidate all startups ? > > Sure ;-) Ok, then let me push a bit more: are you ok with merging the C code from daemon into

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread costinm
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, John Trollinger wrote: > > Consider Apache running on port 80, forwarding to Tomcat on > > 8009 (the default setup). I think it's reasonable for the > > application developer to assume that getServerPort() is going > > to return 80 and not 8009, because they should concep

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config manager.xml

2002-08-28 Thread bobh
bobh2002/08/28 10:04:08 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config manager.xml Log: Removed documentation for "maxInactiveInterval" since setting it is pointless (it is overridden be either the webapp web.xml or the tomcat wide conf/web.xml) Revision ChangesPath 1.3

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7613] - session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Fwd: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors]

2002-08-28 Thread Ryan Lubke
By the way the quote was pulled from section 14.23 of RFC 2616. = Hi, Looking for a little input from the HTTP gurus here. Given the following: "If the requested URI does not include an Internet host name for the service being requested, then the Host header

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config manager.xml

2002-08-28 Thread bobh
bobh2002/08/28 09:46:02 Modified:webapps/docs/config manager.xml Log: - This property is overwritten by the webapp's web.xml or the conf/web.xml, so setting it is pointless. bug 5507 Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +0 -11 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/co

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, John Trollinger wrote: > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:19:19 -0400 > From: John Trollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > > > > > -Ori

HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors

2002-08-28 Thread Ryan Lubke
Hi, Looking for a little input from the HTTP gurus here. Given the following: "If the requested URI does not include an Internet host name for the service being requested, then the Host header field MUST be given with an empty value." So, I'm looking for other interpretations of wh

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12126] - Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread John Trollinger
> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:15 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > > > > > On 28 Aug 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote: > > > Date: 28 Aug 2002 23:27:18 +1000 > >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12129] - The JSP generated servlets have bad package directories

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 28 Aug 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Date: 28 Aug 2002 23:27:18 +1000 > From: Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 > > Craig, > > I think this bug report is inv

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 gump.xml

2002-08-28 Thread bobh
bobh2002/08/28 08:49:07 Added: .gump.xml Log: A first pass at adding gump to TC5. Basically changing 4.0's to 5. I suspect this wont result in a working gump.xml experience, so I set myself up as the nag'ed target. Revision ChangesPath 1.1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12129] New: - The JSP generated servlets have bad package directories

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12128] New: - JSP Comment end symbol not recognized in some cases

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: Tomcat 4 nightly build doesn't starts

2002-08-28 Thread Andrew Conrad
This line of conversation is best in tomcat-user; Pick it up there - Andrew > -Original Message- > From: Dev Zero G Ltd team [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat 4 nightly build doesn't starts > > > I have buil

?? Wrong HTTP Header Encoding, Posted to Bugzilla ??

2002-08-28 Thread Tony LaPaso
Hey all, I'm new to Bugzilla so forgive me if you know about this. I posted this bug against TC 4.1.8 a couple weeks ago but I'm not sure if there is something else I should do to get it in the "Bug Queue". Right now its status is "UNCONFIRMED" (although *I* am pretty sure about it). Is it app

Tomcat 4 nightly build doesn't starts

2002-08-28 Thread Dev Zero G Ltd team
I have built Tomcat from jakarta-tomcat-4.0 cvs module and all necessary subprojects. When I am trying to start it raises an exception: Catalina.start: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.catalina.mbeans.ServerLifecycleListener java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.catalina.mbean

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12098] - Session manager and context class loader

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [4.1.10] Milestone release tag soon

2002-08-28 Thread Brian P. Millett
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:43, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Before a 4.1.10 release I want to get the jk docs updated, they don't have info > on some of the features I added last spring. I'll try to get that done today. > Also, the docs for jk2 & apache (1 or 2) could be enhanced. -- Brian Millett

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12113] - Log4J ConsoleAppender & System.out.println do not display on console

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/coreStandardContext.java

2002-08-28 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Glenn Nielsen wrote: > >> Capturing of stdout/stderr has been enabled in Tomcat 4.1 for 2-3 >> months now. > > > I don't think it was, as RequestBase is deprecated, and is not used > anymore (except in the old connectors). > >> What I committed was a bug fix. If you

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config jk.xml

2002-08-28 Thread glenn
glenn 2002/08/28 06:33:18 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config jk.xml Log: Update jk docs with latest features Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +99 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/jk.xml Index: jk.xml ===

Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
Craig, I think this bug report is invalid, since Tomcat/Apache has no knowledge of load balancers and firewalls, so it is unrealistic to expect to return port numbers that it doesn't know about. What do you think? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12052 Other opinions welcome :-

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12017] - Use of JNI in beans leads to an invalid state, requires Tomcat restart

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12017] - Use of JNI in beans leads to an invalid state, requires Tomcat restart

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: Bug in WebappClassLoader

2002-08-28 Thread David Oxley
Remy, Never mind. Have just seen your commits! Easier than my solution! :) Thanks for getting it into 4.1. Dave. > -Original Message- > From: David Oxley > Sent: 28 August 2002 13:05 > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Subject: RE: Bug in WebappClassLoader > > Remy, > > Here's the new pa

RE: Bug in WebappClassLoader

2002-08-28 Thread David Oxley
Remy, Here's the new patch. Has been tested and allows me to now use RMI (after calling addRepository). Also, I have implemented the URLEncoder from catalina.utils area. See what you think. Dave. > -Original Message- > From: David Oxley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 August 2002

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/coreStandardContext.java

2002-08-28 Thread Remy Maucherat
Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Capturing of stdout/stderr has been enabled in Tomcat 4.1 for 2-3 months > now. I don't think it was, as RequestBase is deprecated, and is not used anymore (except in the old connectors). > What I committed was a bug fix. If you revert it, capturing > stderr/stdout cod

Re: [4.1.10] Milestone release tag soon

2002-08-28 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Before a 4.1.10 release I want to get the jk docs updated, they don't have info on some of the features I added last spring. I'll try to get that done today. Regards, Glenn Remy Maucherat wrote: > I plan, as announced last week, to tag the 4.1.10 release soon. I > consider it as a RC, and we

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/coreStandardContext.java

2002-08-28 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Glenn Nielsen wrote: > >> Remy Maucherat wrote: >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> glenn 2002/08/26 05:15:59 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector RequestBase.java catalina/src

  1   2   >