DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29335] - Tomcat is not showing I18N on TagInfo errors

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29335] - Tomcat is not showing I18N on TagInfo errors

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29335] - Tomcat is not showing I18N on TagInfo errors

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29335] New: - Tomcat is not showing I18N on TagInfo errors

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29333] - Unable to read TLD

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: session facade not used for event

ok, I can do this tomorrow. Filip -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:09 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: session facade not used for event Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: >>>Facading is likely worthless for sessions, > > y

Re: Re: session facade not used for event

Het adres [EMAIL PROTECTED] is voorlopig niet meer in gebruik vanwege grote hoeveelheden virusmails die daarop binnenkomen. Gebruik het nieuwe adres dat op de website staat (linksonder). Excuses voor het ongemak! - To unsubscr

Re: session facade not used for event

Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: Facading is likely worthless for sessions, you think so, you don't think session.setPrincipal is a security issue? Missed that one ;) As Jean-François said, the security manager will avoid the problem. I think it won't hurt replacing the "this"s with "getSession()"s in the

Re: session facade not used for event

Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: Facading is likely worthless for sessions, you think so, you don't think session.setPrincipal is a security issue? Try it by turning the Security Manager on ;-) -- Jeanfrancois Filip - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tom

Re: session facade not used for event

>> Facading is likely worthless for sessions, you think so, you don't think session.setPrincipal is a security issue? Filip - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:02 PM Subject: Re: s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29333] New: - Unable to read TLD

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27222] - Jk2: error mmapping shm file leads to workerEnv.init() create slot epStat.0 failed on Apache 1.3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Gump build failures

Yup, it seems that the Struts team has changed things about a year ago so that the admin doesn't work with it anymore. For debugging this one, it is probably enough to build Tomcat against a CVS co of struts. In general, you can co gump to a machine with python installed and debug the entire proc

[GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 failed

sr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-regexp/build/jakarta-regexp-20040601.jar -Dmail.home=/usr/local/gump/packages/javamail-1.3 -Dant.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist -Dsite2.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2 -Dcommons-collections.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Gump build failures

Hi, Looking at http://gump.covalent.net/log/jakarta-tomcat-5.html, I see Gump failed to build because of admin webapp compilation errors that appear related to the Struts version used. What is our process for debugging this? Are we responsible to ensure the Gump builds succeed? Who owns the "bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: CVS branching

Hi, I'd like to get Gump to build. It seems like it's getting the wrong struts version (1.0.2 instead of 1.1), thereby causing compile errors for the admin webapp? Anyways, let's not continue that discussion in this thread. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics >-Original Message--

Re: session facade not used for event

Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: Quick question, is there a reason the user code has access to the internal session instead of the session facade on session events? event = new HttpSessionBindingEvent(this,name,value); //inside StandardSession as opposed to this code, which would give the user a facade? ev

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

session facade not used for event

Quick question, is there a reason the user code has access to the internal session instead of the session facade on session events? >event = new HttpSessionBindingEvent(this,name,value); //inside StandardSession as opposed to this code, which would give the user a facade? event = new HttpSession

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28940] - Deployer can't treat multi-byte characters in JSP correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

yoavs 2004/06/01 12:22:20 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Added UTF-8 encoding to deployer build: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28940 Revision ChangesPath 1.61 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Index:

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5/resources/deployer build.xml

yoavs 2004/06/01 12:22:09 Modified:resources/deployer build.xml Log: Added UTF-8 encoding to deployer build: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28940 Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat-5/resources/deployer/build.xml Index: bui

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23610] - unknown SSI directives

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26783] - File Upload fails for files > 8K

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29327] New: - ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(path_servlet) throws Exception instead of returning null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: CVS branching

Since Gump(y) hasn't built for months, it can't complain more than it already is doing ;-). The real question is whether we want to run Gump on the 5.0 branch as well as HEAD. - Original Message - From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27534] - Servlet invoked twice with JK2 when response is not read completely.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28631] - JAASRealm fix to permit user-specified user/group Principals

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29324] - Admin Application can't create new Host with server-minimal.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29324] New: - Admin Application can't create new Host with server-minimal.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29166] - Expect: 100-Continue fails after 401 Unauthorized

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

GateLock Virus Notification.

Dear GateLock user, GateLock has detected the WORM_NETSKY.D in your email attachment "application.pif". The file could not be cleaned and was therefore deleted.--- Begin Message --- Please read the attached file. --- End Message ---

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

remm2004/06/01 08:00:10 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: - Update changelog. Revision ChangesPath 1.60 +8 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Index: changelog.xml ==

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java InternalInputBuffer.java

remm2004/06/01 07:34:22 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java InternalInputBuffer.java Log: - Bug 29166: Tweak expectation handling so that if the expectation isn't satisfied, we don't attempt to swallow the request's b

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: I think renaming the classes, like they did for Xerces in j2se 1.5, would be the easiest way. But since we are "refactoring", we can also think of a pluggable SPI were the digester can be "plugged", as well as our own parsing mechanism. That would be usefull when Tomca

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik (lists) wrote: BTW, is it ok if I start my refatoring(s) in a separate branch based on go ahead, refator. :-) I'll "refator" then. I'll redo logging as well, and define c-l categories (for webapps, for example) to be able to eventually remove Logger altogether

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

Remy Maucherat wrote: Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, We need to do a new release, 5.0.26, because of http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29255. Does anyone have stuff they're working on, and would therefore like me to wait a couple of days (or more, or less?) before tagging and building?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26890] - Multipart/Form-Data Unexpected End Of Part

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28612] - configure script fails locating libapr

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Yeah, go ahead with the refactoring. I'll tag 5.0.26 tonight (on HEAD of course) unless I hear some last-minute things on this list during the day today. I'm going to open a separate thread on CVS branching, I need a bit of clarification in that area. I need to tweak a bit

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28234] - uri: worker property does not exist any more

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29174] - complain about liveDeploy tags and enhance documentation of deployOnStartup

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs-faq misc.xml

yoavs 2004/06/01 06:13:19 Modified:docs/faq misc.html docs/faq/printer misc.html xdocs-faq misc.xml Log: Added logging configuration link. Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/faq/misc.html Index: misc.htm

CVS branching

Hi, So at some point soon (the next day or two), we want to put the current tomcat 5 code on a branch called tomcat_5_0 (the actual branch name is tentative but let's use tomcat_5_0 for example). We'll do this after tagging TOMCAT_5_0_26 on the main branch. The actual CVS command is easy: cvs rt

RE: Time for 5.0.26?

Hi, Yeah, go ahead with the refactoring. I'll tag 5.0.26 tonight (on HEAD of course) unless I hear some last-minute things on this list during the day today. I'm going to open a separate thread on CVS branching, I need a bit of clarification in that area. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Info

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28469] - stderr is closed when it is used by jk_logger_file.c

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28469] - stderr is closed when it is used by jk_logger_file.c

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28469] - stderr is closed when it is used by jk_logger_file.c

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: How to configure a tomcat project in Eclipse.

Hi peter, What I actually meant by Tomcat Project, was't a tomcat webapps project, But Project from tomcat Source code. Please treat it accordingly. Regards, Jagsir -Original Message- From: Peter Rossbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:58 AM To: Tomcat Devel