Re: jk 1.2.6 and Tomcat 3.3.2

The code in 3.3.2 was : Nov 17, 2004 8:42:25 AM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke INFO: Unknown message 0 in org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest : public int invoke(Msg msg, MsgContext ep ) throws IOException { int type=msg.getByte(); default:

Re: jk 1.2.6 and Tomcat 3.3.2

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:09:44 -0800, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Discussion about Tomcat dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:42 AM > Subject: jk 1.2.6 and Tomcat 3.3.2 > > >

Re: Jasper-compiler woes

Thank You that worked- although with the JDTCompilerAdapter I dont see any error messages just 0 length java files?? This frosts my shorts because 2 years ago I used JspC extensively for Jasper compiler with extensive debugging and error logging now I find jasper-compiler.jar JspC ant interface is

Re: Bug with contextInitialized using otherServletContext.getContext ?

Remy Maucherat wrote: Your event is sent at the end of the initialization of a context. Your other context might not exist yet. This is not a bug. Even though one might interpret the spec a little diffrent here There's nothing to interpret here, as the specification cannot specify this. The onl

Re: 5.5 dies silent

Vic wrote: When 5.5 dies via .exe, there is no console output as to why. (OK, so I tried Java 6 http://weblogs.java.net/blog/mreinhold/archive/2004/11/mustang_snapsho.html) I have to start it w/ java -jar bootstrap.jar to get some output (and it works w/ Java 6 like that). Generally, there are

5.5 dies silent

When 5.5 dies via .exe, there is no console output as to why. (OK, so I tried Java 6 http://weblogs.java.net/blog/mreinhold/archive/2004/11/mustang_snapsho.html) I have to start it w/ java -jar bootstrap.jar to get some output (and it works w/ Java 6 like that). .V -

RE: web.xml since J2EE 1.4

Hi, The Servlet Specification is the place to look: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet. Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com >-Original Message- >From: Schalk Neethling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 2:16 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: web.xml

web.xml since J2EE 1.4

Greetings Can someone please point me to where I can learn the changes that happened to web.xml since J2EE 1.4. Up to now I have had no trouble but, when trying to configure the taglibs for Struts using the web.xml I am getting parser errors. It seems to have a problem with the taglib directive

Re: jk 1.2.6 and Tomcat 3.3.2

- Original Message - From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion about Tomcat dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:42 AM Subject: jk 1.2.6 and Tomcat 3.3.2 > Hi to all, > > I wonder if some of you still get this message in Tomcat 4.1.x and 5.0.x/5.5.x :

RE: [Patch] JNDIRealm throws InvalidNameException if LDAP DN contains '/' or '"' [Auf Viren geprüft]

Ah! I just wondered where my patch went. I first tried an bugzilla, but a search in JNDIRealm gave me DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Got error 28 from table handler [for Statement "SELECT bugs.bug_id, bugs.bug_severity, bugs.priority, bugs.bug_status, bugs.resolution, bugs.bug_severity, bugs.pri

RE: [Patch] JNDIRealm throws InvalidNameException if LDAP DN contains '/' or '"' [Auf Viren geprüft]

Hi, Attachments don't come through on these lists: please use Bugzilla to submit it. Thanks, Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:50 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Patch

[Patch] JNDIRealm throws InvalidNameException if LDAP DN contains '/' or '"' [Auf Viren geprüft]

JNDIRealm in Tomcat 5.0.29 throws an InvalidNameException while authenticating a user if the users LDAP DN contains a slash ('/') or double quote ('"'). These are characters are allowed in LDAP DNs but special characters in Javas CompositeName and are not handled correctly in JNDIRealm. The append

jk 1.2.6 and Tomcat 3.3.2

Hi to all, I wonder if some of you still get this message in Tomcat 4.1.x and 5.0.x/5.5.x : XXX unknowon type 0 I'm using Apache 2.0.50 and Tomcat 3.3.2 with jk 1.2.6 and got this message sometimes. As result Tomcat close the AJP connection and jk should recreate a new socket. Regards ---

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32262] New: - Possible deadlock in TcpWorkerThread and ThreadPool

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apa

Re: Bug with contextInitialized using otherServletContext.getContext ?

Andreas Steffan wrote: Hallo Remy, Remy Maucherat wrote: What do you think ? Your event is sent at the end of the initialization of a context. Your other context might not exist yet. This is not a bug. Even though one might interpret the spec a little diffrent here There's nothing to interpret h

Re: Question about new mod_jk jk_lb_worker.c

Rainer Jung wrote, On 11/16/2004 1:11 AM: Unfortunately I don't understand. Trying to combine rotatelogs with mod_jk.log in the following way (apache 1.3): Doh. I've been using Apache 2 for so long I forgot that it doesn't work with Apache 1.3. It does work using Apache 2 / mod_jk. -Dave -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31426] - OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread - and tomcat "hangs"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32262] - Possible deadlock in TcpWorkerThread and ThreadPool

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32262] New: - Possible deadlock in TcpWorkerThread and ThreadPool

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Question about new mod_jk jk_lb_worker.c

Rainer Jung wrote: Unfortunately I don't understand. Trying to combine rotatelogs with mod_jk.log in the following way (apache 1.3): JkLogFile "|/home/jung/mkb/apache/bin/rotatelogs /home/jung/mkb/apache/logs/mod_jk.log 600" doesn't work. It does neither log, nor spawn a rotatelogs process. Of

Re: Bug with contextInitialized using otherServletContext.getContext ?

Hallo Remy, Remy Maucherat wrote: What do you think ? Your event is sent at the end of the initialization of a context. Your other context might not exist yet. This is not a bug. Even though one might interpret the spec a little diffrent here, I think you raise a valid argument here and it is ind

Re: Question about new mod_jk jk_lb_worker.c

Unfortunately I don't understand. Trying to combine rotatelogs with mod_jk.log in the following way (apache 1.3): JkLogFile "|/home/jung/mkb/apache/bin/rotatelogs /home/jung/mkb/apache/logs/mod_jk.log 600" doesn't work. It does neither log, nor spawn a rotatelogs process. Inside apaches CustomL

Re: Question about new mod_jk jk_lb_worker.c

I would be pleased to use rotatelogs, but it doesn't work with mod_jk.log (at least not last time I checked). David Rees wrote: Rainer Jung wrote, On 11/14/2004 7:31 AM: 0) Any ideas on rotating the mod_jk log file? Use cronolog http://cronolog.org/ or the rotatelogs program included with Apach