Begin forwarded message:
> From: John Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri Apr 27, 2001 06:26:04 AM US/Pacific
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: tomcat and ISPs
>
> Hi Duncan,
> I'm writing you just because you were the first name on the "who we are"
> page on jakarta.apache.org site :)
> This membership position gives ASF (and the open source developers that
> ASF represents) a powerful voice in shaping the future of the Java
> platform. In addition, however, it imposes responsibilities to follow
> the
> rules of the Java Community Process -- the same rules that software
> ven
> Duncan, can you help out?
I'll see what I can do. Be forewarned, forward progress will take at least a
week to start seeing. I'll just liase with a subset of this group though.
.duncan
--
James Duncan Davidson
http://x180.net/
--
keep their competitors to figure out how they get better performance. :)
.duncan
--
James Duncan Davidson
http://x180.net/ !try; do();
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
istic.
There was very high interest at the time that this was percolating around,
but if Bill M. has now left, well... Then its a staffing concern. Rgh. I'm
still digging, so...
--
James Duncan Davidson
http://x180.net/
rote a JSR-ignition document but the 'javac' team sucked
> it, well, I don't know anything about it.
I'll check up on this.
--
James Duncan Davidson
http://x180.net/ !try; do();
--
es).
At least that's my two cents from having been around the class loader block
a few times.
.duncan
--
James Duncan Davidson
http://x180.net/ !try; do();
-
To unsubscri
on 2/7/01 5:12 PM, Marc Saegesser at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any bug introduced by a code change since Tomcat 3.2.1 was released MUST
> be fixed. If it worked in 3.2.1 it will work in 3.2.2.
"no regressions" I think is the term that you are looking for.
--
James Dunc
nt not only to helping with the release,
>> but to provide maintenance support beyond the release.
>
> I'm not sure that I agree with this. What if I want to state my approval,
> but don't want to help out?
+0 it.
--
Ja
On 1/22/01 4:16 PM, "Geoff Soutter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, sounds reasonable. Maybe I ought to be asking how do we protect the
> people that get offended? :-)
Those who need to be protected shouldn't walk outside their front door.
feedback to Jim's
mail -- and I also figured that if you really wanted to call in, you'd do so
anyways. :)
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
---
voicing it here, or to him
personally, is the appropriate thing to do. Or if you want the PMC's charter
expanded, that's something that can be discussed.
--
James Duncan Davidson[
welcome
to do so.. :) Or whatever else. I personally can make sure that
teleconferences happen. That's about it. For other kinds of collaborative
efforts, others are going to have to step forward.
--
James Duncan Davidson
get out the Saran wrap and wrap up his hand.. :)
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
-
To unsubscr
th your postings, I probably would have flamed him a bit for that... As
far as other people reprehending you, well, that's their business.
> I wanted to see how far this could go.
I get the feeling that we have people "playing chess" with this sort of
thing. I'm not happy abo
That's akin to what I've
been told that as PMC chair, I have to put my opinions aside. That of course
is utter bs. If you're on the PMC, it's because you are supposed to *have*
an opinion.
--
James Duncan Da
uot; +1.
My reading of the situation is that if you vote +1, that's a commitment to
help, not just support of the plan. Support of the plan is a +0.
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's something that needs to happen with the XML project. However PMCs are
given a fair amount of latitude currently by the ASF to run things how they
perceive best. Given that, it's hard to tell.
You should bring this up on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis
hat Craig meant that they were in Pier's checked out
sandbox. As to why Pier hasn't been checking in code more often, that's a
different story.
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ecision guidelines (or amend them if needed) for a vote
> on a Release Plan. I want to avoid a "Florida recount situation",
> where the rules are being made up while the votes are counted ;-)
Agreed. I don't want to debate about hanging chads.
--
James Duncan Davidson
n. :)
Just FYI -- I hate being silent for too long.. :)
Also, if anybody in Dublin/Prague/NYC would like to get together and chat,
my schedule may permit such meetings (over beer of course!). Send me private
mail if you are interested and we'll see what can happen.
.duncan
--
J
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
-- Forwarded Message
From: James Duncan Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17
why the JAXP JSR community wishes
> to remain a PITA in this matter. It should follow the lead of the servlet
> JSR. What's particularly puzzling about this to me is that the enlightened
> individual that took that JSR fully open source leads the JAXP JSR...
I don't get t
, and reuse it in
> a non-Apache product that does a fancy GUI interface? The Apache
> license allows (encourages!) this, but the JAXP license does
> not, right?
What I'm saying is that you can redist the jaxp.jar file containing the
classes of the implementation. That's what we n
rom the 3.2.1 source distribution that he or she
> grabbed off the web site.
Branches cause headaches even for long term project people. There's lots of
people that have been working for a very long time on Apache. They use this
new repository model, and have fo
crapping the use of JAXP --
esp since two implementations of the parser and the impl of the transform
engine is under the ASF license. Or should we just hard code the
dependencies and not let people choose which parser to use?
--
James Duncan Davidson
ename. This would
make it clear that one tree is the -DEV tree, another is the -STABLE one. I
dunno, just a thought?
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hine that is not totally tweaked out and running under
heavy load. Moving the performance hit around works until your site gets
pounded every time your company's commercial gets played during the
super-bowl :)
.duncan
--
James Duncan Davidson
27;t mind getting splatted in a pinch, or that you won't do
anything more than annoy if it goes splat (loosing a shopping cart even is
annoying, but not totally reprehensible as long as you have 99.9% updtime).
Data that has to be preserved has to go into a database or an EJB. Anything
invo
On 12/29/00 12:04 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yea, it denied my Berkeley, CA address at one point. :-)
Yep. No way to map IP's to physical location except by top level ISPs -- and
then only sortof. :)
.duncan
-
learer that I wasn't just trying to
say to you "knock it off" -- more like "just because there's mail here still
coming in on the topic, please don't make more" which is aimed at everyone
in general and nobody in particular.
--
James Duncan Davi
On 12/28/00 11:29 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting James Duncan Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Sideline this *now*. This will get discussed at the PMC meeting.
>
> Can non-PMC members like myself attend this ?
Yep. It wi
tributed to the ASF -- and the ASF accepts, it's *much*
better to check in a .jar file. Very much cleaner from a legal standpoint.
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
led classes, things
should be ok.
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
ostin (it sure looks so from
> his postings).
>
> In fact, Jon is the only person trying to turn this into a lousy Costin
> versus Craig war.
Sideline this *now*. This will get discussed at the PMC meeting.
--
James Duncan Davidson
o request that both sides draw a line, stay to their
side of the road, do their thing, and figure out what they want to say at
that meeting.
James Duncan Davidson
Jakarta PMC Chairman
36 matches
Mail list logo
