Re: Tomcat 4.0.4b1 calls init() twice? (and strange bugs)

2002-03-11 Thread Kevin A. Burton
stack trace... Give you a better report soon. - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965 Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web - http://relativity.yi.org/ I'm intercontinental when I eat fren

Re: Tomcat 4.0.4b1 calls init() twice? (and strange bugs)

2002-03-11 Thread Kevin A. Burton
use any of the other builds because it breaks my code... :( Thanks for you help Remy! Time for sleep... Kevin - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965 Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web

Re: Tomcat 4.0.4b1 calls init() twice? (and strange bugs)

2002-03-11 Thread Kevin A. Burton
n there anyway. > > > > > > BTW, could I also get more info on your problem with init ? > > > > Yes... init is being called twice on the same instance of the Servlet. > > Oops. That's a really stupid bug caused by a C&P error when I ported a patch >

Re: Tomcat 4.0.4b1 calls init() twice? (and strange bugs)

2002-03-10 Thread Kevin A. Burton
false; public void init( ServletConfig config ) throws ServletException { if ( initialized == false ) { //do stuff initialized = true; } } This fixes the problem... but should be fixed in Tomcat IMO. - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EM

Re: Tomcat 4.0.4b1 calls init() twice? (and strange bugs)

2002-03-10 Thread Kevin A. Burton
classloader and I will get Exceptions when it can't find my code. I can't move my code from WEB-INF/classes because I am using Tomcat class reloading to test out new extension code when I am developing... Puts us in a tough situation huh ;) Thanks! Kevin - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PRO

Re: Tomcat 4.0.4b1 calls init() twice? (and strange bugs)

2002-03-10 Thread Kevin A. Burton
into common/lib ? > > Whatever you fixed has broke Xalan extension support ... at least in my app > > which has run just fine under anything pre 4.0.3... Thanks! - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Location - San Francisco, CA, Ce

Re: Tomcat 4.0.4b1 calls init() twice? (and strange bugs)

2002-03-10 Thread Kevin A. Burton
the wierdness that I was talking about. What Xalan bug did you fix? Could you give me more insight here? Whatever you fixed has broke Xalan extension support ... at least in my app which has run just fine under anything pre 4.0.3... Kevin - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECT

Tomcat 4.0.4b1 calls init() twice? (and strange bugs)

2002-03-09 Thread Kevin A. Burton
trange bug. Anyway... thanks. - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965 Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web - http://relativity.yi.org/ Any sufficiently advanced terrorist is indistinguis

Re: 4.0.1 ClassLoader breaks singletons on webapp reload.

2001-11-25 Thread Kevin A. Burton
e is > currently broken and has been for some time now...it needs to be re-written... Are you saying that the theory is broken or just Turbine's impl? Kevin - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Location - San Francisco, CA, Ce

Re: 4.0.1 ClassLoader breaks singletons on webapp reload.

2001-11-25 Thread Kevin A. Burton
n the want to deploy webapps with singletons that have support for reloading? Kevin - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965 Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web - http://relativity.yi.org/ Says Ra

4.0.1 ClassLoader breaks singletons on webapp reload.

2001-11-25 Thread Kevin A. Burton
e any way around this? - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965 Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web - http://relativity.yi.org/ If you play with fire, you might get burned. If you elim

Re: Why are we still using JAXP and ProjectX???(proprietary==evil)

2001-01-09 Thread Kevin A. Burton
y into JDK 1.4? I would hate to see a code > versioning problem around this from a technical standpoint. Well... these issues will be around for a while due to the fact that Java is proprietary. I don't see an easy resolution until this is fixed. Kevin - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Why are we still using JAXP and ProjectX??? (proprietary==evil)

2001-01-09 Thread Kevin A. Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > on 1/3/2001 10:24 PM, "Kevin A. Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ug. > > > > Checked over the archives and didn't see this > > > >

Re: Why are we still using JAXP and ProjectX??? (proprietary==evil)

2001-01-09 Thread Kevin A. Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Duncan Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 1/3/01 10:24 PM, "Kevin A. Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why are we using JAXP and ProjectX which are both Closed Source and > > proprietary

Why are we still using JAXP and ProjectX??? (proprietary==evil)

2001-01-03 Thread Kevin A. Burton
eedom :(. This came up because I am having problems with ProjectX.. Kevin -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Cell: 408-910-6145 URL: http://relativity.yi.org ICQ: 73488596 The worse thing in life is to fall short! counter-intelligence O