On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> I still see no good reasons to make a 'copy'...
Well, for the JNI invocation ( starting the VM inprocess ) - I just want
to make sure that jk is not missing any 'trick' - as you know this is
a very OS-specific and delicate problem. Right now it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>
>>I am +1 for merging the code but in daemon. I am using the daemon code for
>>projects not related with mod_jk and I would perfer to have it independant from
>>mod_jk.
>>An other point to be against moving it in mo
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> I am +1 for merging the code but in daemon. I am using the daemon code for
> projects not related with mod_jk and I would perfer to have it independant from
> mod_jk.
> An other point to be against moving it in mod_jk is that the code has been m
Remy,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> +1 from me.
>
> If we do that, that would mean commons-daemon is not going anywhere:
> - the interfaces will go away
> - the launcher code is supposed to end up in Ant
>
> If the launcher doesn't end up in Ant, then IMO we should create
> commons-launcher.
>
S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>
>>>Are you ok with a change for daemon to use introspection, and remove the
>>>dependency from tomcat to daemon plus consolidate all startups ?
>>
>>Sure ;-)
>
>
> Ok, then let me push a bit more: are you ok with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>
>>>Are you ok with a change for daemon to use introspection, and remove the
>>>dependency from tomcat to daemon plus consolidate all startups ?
>>
>>Sure ;-)
>
>
> Ok, then let me push a bit more: are you ok with
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> > Are you ok with a change for daemon to use introspection, and remove the
> > dependency from tomcat to daemon plus consolidate all startups ?
>
> Sure ;-)
Ok, then let me push a bit more: are you ok with merging the C code
from daemon into
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>
>>I am using the jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon to start/stop Tomcat in several
>>projects so I am +1 for using these things.
>>But I am going on holidays in the next minutes (till 28 august).
>
>
> Are you ok with
Remy,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> No, I'd rather do something according to the pre-proposal put forward by
> Costin that would be a refactoring of the whole startup and
> configuration code, rather than an evolution of the current code. I
> don't have much interest in trying to improve that cod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Patrick Luby wrote:
>
>
>>Wouldn't commons-daemon also want to use Bootstrap.java's classloader,
>>etc. setup? Right now, all of this is buried in main() instead of a
>>method that commons-daemon could access.
>
>
> Sure - split the main into se
Patrick Luby wrote:
> All,
>
> I have tested out some code in o.a.c.startup.Bootstrap.main() that finds
> and loads the JDK tools (e.g. javac), loads the JSSE jars in
> "jsse.home", turns on the Java security manager, determines and
> catalina.home dynamically. These steps are currently done b
11 matches
Mail list logo
