Re[2]:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Please ignore my last message, my mailer delivered the last email late to me so I thought you were planning another release. Sorry Reply Separator Subject:Re:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release Author: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PRO

Re:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Since 4.0.2 is already released, shouldn't this be tagged 4.0.3b2 ? Reply Separator Subject:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release Author: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 1/16/2002 3:10 PM Hi, I think it would

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > [...] > > [ ] +1 Make the release > [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: > -bip -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

> > [ ] +1 Make the release > [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > > +1 if the load balancing code gets in. > > > -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will > > > not work in 4.0.2 ). > > > > I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ? > > Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

> > [ ] +1 Make the release > [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: > Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

+1 - Original Message - From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:02 PM Subject: RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release > >I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

>I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of >the week (with >the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: > > >[ ] +1 Make the release >[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help >[ ] -0 Bad idea >[ ] -1 No, because: > > > > > +1 since you'll add the load-balancing stuff

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Remy Maucherat wrote: > I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with > the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: > > > [ ] +1 Make the release > [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: > Bojan -- To unsub

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Hi, > > I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with > the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: > > > [X] +1 Make the release > [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: > > > > The

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > +1 if the load balancing code gets in. > > -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will > > not work in 4.0.2 ). > > I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ? Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a trivial thing,

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

> +1 if the load balancing code gets in. > -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will > not work in 4.0.2 ). I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ? Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

+1 if the load balancing code gets in. -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will not work in 4.0.2 ). Costin > The release process will be the following: > - Tag j-t-c/webapp with "tomcat_402_b2" > - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

> > [X] +1 Make the release > [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: Amy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Is there a plan to build native webapp for Apache 2.0 as well as 1.3? > > > [ ] +1 Make the release > [X ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

> > > [X] +1 Make the release > [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: > > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Hi, > > I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with > the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: > > > [X] +1 Make the release > [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: > > > > The

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > [X] +1 Make the release > [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: > > Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Hi, I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: [ ] +1 Make the release [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: The release process will be the following: - Tag j-t-c/