Hi,
I don't know really know how to contribute or if this is valuable or not,
but I added PRE_CLASSPATH and POST_CLASSPATH options to the batch file so
that users invoking Tomcat can add arbitrary elements to the classpath (for
example, for debugging purposes). Here it is, throw it in CVS if the
/show_bug.cgi?id=33621
Summary: java.lang.IllegalStateException with tomcat 5.5.4
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.4
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Unknown
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33621.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm getting the below WARNING when Tomcat 5.5.4 starts up on Windows 2000
server:
Feb 2, 2005 10:50:49 AM org.apache.catalina.core.NamingContextListener
addResource
WARNING: Failed to register in JMX: javax.naming.NamingException: Could
not create resource factory
:245)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)
note The full stack trace of the root cause is available in the Apache
Tomcat/5.5.4 logs.
Apache Tomcat/5.5.4
/show_bug.cgi?id=32856
Summary: java.lang.securityException in tomcat 5.5.4
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.4
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P1
Component: Jasper
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32856.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
)
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:245)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)
note The full stack trace of the root cause is available in the Apache
Tomcat/5.5.4 logs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32793.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32793.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32793.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=32793
Summary: Can't run Tomcat 5.5.4 with JRE version 5.0
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.4
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: Catalina
/show_bug.cgi?id=32332
Summary: Tomcat 5.5.4 displays system-tray icon when it shouldn't
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.4
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32332.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32332.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
After ample time for voting, we've ratified Tomcat 5.5.4 as a stable
release, the first one of the 5.5 branch.
The voting archive is here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10996632613r=1w=2. There were 3
binding +1 votes (Remy, Mladen, myself) and 1 non-binding +1 vote
(David
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Tomcat 5.5.4 has been available for about a week now, and tentatively
rated alpha for this time. Now that people have hopefully had some time
to test it out, let's vote on its stability.
The release passes all our internal tests, and also passes the Servlet
and JSP TCKs
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
A non-binding vote. I've done a bit of testing and haven't had any issues.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 6:42 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 5.5.4 Stability
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Tomcat 5.5.4 has been available for about a week now, and tentatively
rated alpha for this time. Now that people have hopefully had some time
to test
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
So following the usual criteria, Tomcat 5.5.4 is:
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Sorry for the delay.
I just got a new computer, so needed to set everything up and
running.
MT.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi,
Tomcat 5.5.4 has been available for about a week now, and tentatively
rated alpha for this time. Now that people have hopefully had some time
to test it out, let's vote on its stability.
The release passes all our internal tests, and also passes the Servlet
and JSP TCKs. There have been
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Tomcat 5.5.4 has been available for about a week now, and tentatively
rated alpha for this time. Now that people have hopefully had some time
to test it out, let's vote on its stability.
The release passes all our internal tests, and also passes the Servlet
and JSP TCKs
Hi,
Will the powers that be please run the Servlet and JSP TCKs for Tomcat
5.5.4-alpha? I'd like to have the stability vote soon. Thanks,
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and
may contain information
Hi,
Thank you ;)
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
-Original Message-
From: Dianne Jiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 2:56 PM
To: Shapira, Yoav
Subject: Re: TCKs for 5.5.4
Hi,
Just ran the TCK - all tests passed.
--Dianne
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi
dear tomcat-developers,
i installed the latest tomcat-5.5.4.
when i try to start a webapp that runs without problems
on tomcat 5.5.3, i get the following error:
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/5.5.4
Nov 1, 2004 10:24:46 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost
,
martin
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 11:02, Martin Grotzke wrote:
dear tomcat-developers,
i installed the latest tomcat-5.5.4.
when i try to start a webapp that runs without problems
on tomcat 5.5.3, i get the following error:
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat
Martin Grotzke wrote:
dear tomcat-developers,
i installed the latest tomcat-5.5.4.
when i try to start a webapp that runs without problems
on tomcat 5.5.3, i get the following error:
It works for me. I d/led the distribution, as packaging problems are
always a possibility
Martin Grotzke wrote:
hello,
that was only half of the story.
what i forgot to mention:
the web.xml contains a listener-entry for a class, that
initializes log4j with a specified log4j.xml (here
log4j.mescalin.xml).
when i remove the entry for the listener in the web.xml,
tomcat starts without any
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 13:26, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Martin Grotzke wrote:
one problem is that the webapp does not start, but another problem
is that tomcat fails to start if one context is not starting correctly.
my system:
fedora core 2
sun jdk 1.5 (jpackage.org)
tomcat 5.5.4 alpha
Martin Grotzke wrote:
what's bogus there?
The report.
i only wanted to let you know that there were changes from tc-5.5.3 to
5.5.4 that make the described error possible. if i've choses wrong words
for this, then i'm sorry about that.
There are no relevant changes between 5.5.3 and 5.5.4
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 13:29, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Martin Grotzke wrote:
hello,
that was only half of the story.
what i forgot to mention:
the web.xml contains a listener-entry for a class, that
initializes log4j with a specified log4j.xml (here
log4j.mescalin.xml).
when i remove
Martin Grotzke wrote:
The Filter includes one statement:
System.setProperty( javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory,
org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderFactoryImpl );
the webapp contains xerces-1.4.4 in WEB-INF/lib, this jar includes
org/apache/xerces/jaxp/DocumentBuilderFactoryImpl.class.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Martin Grotzke wrote:
The Filter includes one statement:
System.setProperty( javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory,
org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderFactoryImpl );
the webapp contains xerces-1.4.4 in WEB-INF/lib, this jar includes
( javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory,
org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderFactoryImpl );
}
this prevents tomcat 5.5.4 from starting successfully,
in tomcat 5.5.3 it has no impact.
cheers,
martin
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability
of Tomcat 5.5.4-alpha. This build contains numerous bug fixes and other
improvments, and hopefully gets us closer to the first stable 5.5 release.
Release notes: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/RELEASE
Great Yoav,
do it on friday is very good
Peter
Shapira, Yoav schrieb:
Hi,
Would everyone be OK with cutting the 5.5.4 release tomorrow (Friday,
October 29th) instead of Saturday (October 30th) as we originally
agreed? It'd be more convenient for me, that's the only reason. If it
can't
... so please finish committing by then, and update the changelog with
your latest stuff if you've yet to do so.
The release will be a tentative alpha, and a stability vote will take
please next week.
Can someone with access to the Servlet and JSP TCKs please run them on
5.5.4 once it's
Hi,
Would everyone be OK with cutting the 5.5.4 release tomorrow (Friday,
October 29th) instead of Saturday (October 30th) as we originally
agreed? It'd be more convenient for me, that's the only reason. If it
can't be done on Friday, it'll likely have to be Monday afternoon
instead
fine by me.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 2:16 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Tomcat 5.5.4 tomorrow (Friday) instead of Saturday?
Hi,
Would everyone be OK with cutting the 5.5.4 release tomorrow (Friday
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Would everyone be OK with cutting the 5.5.4 release tomorrow (Friday,
October 29th) instead of Saturday (October 30th) as we originally
agreed? It'd be more convenient for me, that's the only reason. If it
can't be done on Friday, it'll likely have to be Monday afternoon
Hi,
Looks like a RESOLVED-WONTFIX ;)
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
-Original Message-
From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 5:06 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 5.5.4 ?
Yes, I had tested it a little earlier, and it doesn't work
, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Looks like a RESOLVED-WONTFIX ;)
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
-Original Message-
From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 5:06 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 5.5.4 ?
Yes, I had tested it a little
Hi,
What are the plans for 5.5.4 ?
I want to resolve (either fix or invalid, whatever) Bugzilla 31090
(space in context name makes session IDs crap, 31372
(AuthenticatorBase#register method), the couple of doc items, and
possibly 31656 (make Tomcat build with Struts 1.2). This week looks
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
What are the plans for 5.5.4 ?
I want to resolve (either fix or invalid, whatever) Bugzilla 31090
I should have fixed that one, but I'm not sure, so someone needs to test it.
(space in context name makes session IDs crap, 31372
(AuthenticatorBase#register method
Hi,
(space in context name makes session IDs crap, 31372
(AuthenticatorBase#register method), the couple of doc items, and
So that there are no surprises, I'm -1 for the patch proposed in the
bug
report.
I saw your comments on this issue for another bug, and was hoping you
could post them
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 11:48, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
What are the plans for 5.5.4 ?
I want to resolve (either fix or invalid, whatever) Bugzilla 31090
I should have fixed that one, but I'm not sure, so someone needs to test it.
Just tested
Ben Souther wrote:
Just tested with:
jakarta-tomcat-5-bin-20041024.tar.gz
and the problem still exists.
I can test build from the CVS head tonight and test if you think it's
different.
Yes, I had tested it a little earlier, and it doesn't work. The path
would apparently have to be encoded in the
Yes, I had tested it a little earlier, and it doesn't work. The path
would apparently have to be encoded in the same way as the URL.
OK, let me know if I can help.
Quite
frankly, I'm not sure we're going to do this, since the encoding on the
client side is quite unpredictable.
Other than
Hi,
What are the plans for 5.5.4 ?
(note: I didn't put my stuff in the changelog yet, sorry)
I didn't do the host manager and the optimized access log yet, but of
course none of these are mandatory features. Overall, I didn't hear
about too many problems with 5.5.3 (a very good thing, obviously
49 matches
Mail list logo
