It seems JSR77 has been posted - I think everyone should read it.
What's important is the set of naming conventions for the managed
objects we expose - I strongly believe that we should use those
names wherever we provide the equivalent functionality.
For example ( on what is important for me ):
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: List Tomcat-Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: JSR77 & tomcat5 configuration
>
&g
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> In general, my view is that the JSR-77 standards for managed object
> names, and the corresponding attributes, are not fine grained enough to
> deal with the actual manageable components in a servlet container. We're
> going to need many more MBe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It seems JSR77 has been posted - I think everyone should read it.
>
> What's important is the set of naming conventions for the managed
> objects we expose - I strongly believe that we should use those
> names wherever we provide the equivalent functionality.
>
> For e
