The documentation for setting up a logger for JK2 is below. I've tried using
logger.file and logger.win32 for my IIS configuration, but no luck. Can
someone please send the right configuration steps to configure JK2 logging with
IIS? I'm trying to locate a "bug" in JK
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently there was a question on the Users List about log messages in
> the Apache's error.log.
> I've changed the INFO logging to get logged as notice instead of warning
> (cause it may be misleading as the user reported).
> Now, I propose to cha
Hi,
Recently there was a question on the Users List about log messages in
the Apache's error.log.
I've changed the INFO logging to get logged as notice instead of warning
(cause it may be misleading as the user reported).
Now, I propose to change the every occurrence of the following:
if( ch->mb
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > If nobody oposes, I will check in a current build of commons-logging
> > ( with the option to override it for those who like downloading
> > each individual dependency ).
>
> -0.5. The current property system looks ok to me, and Tomcat itself alread
> Hi,
>
> A quick proposal ( vote ? ): I would like to start using commons-logging
> in jk2. Right now it has println() style, but beeing able to benefit
> from the fine control that log4j ( and other loggers ) provides
> would help a lot.
+1.
> If nobody oposes, I will check in a current build
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A quick proposal ( vote ? ): I would like to start using commons-logging
> in jk2. Right now it has println() style, but beeing able to benefit
> from the fine control that log4j ( and other loggers ) provides
> would help a lot.
>
> If nobody oposes, I will
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:00 AM
Subject: Jk2 logging
> Hi,
>
> A quick proposal ( vote ? ): I would like to start using commons-logging
> in jk2. Right now it has println() style, bu
>A quick proposal ( vote ? ): I would like to start using
>commons-logging
>in jk2. Right now it has println() style, but beeing able to benefit
>from the fine control that log4j ( and other loggers ) provides
>would help a lot.
>
>If nobody oposes, I will check in a current build of commons-lo
Hi,
A quick proposal ( vote ? ): I would like to start using commons-logging
in jk2. Right now it has println() style, but beeing able to benefit
from the fine control that log4j ( and other loggers ) provides
would help a lot.
If nobody oposes, I will check in a current build of commons-loggi
