Just another Benchmark

2001-03-02 Thread Thomas Bezdicek
Hi, we tried the apachebench on our solaris system, to check out differences between architectures and thereby we found a quite interesting behaviour. When serving a static page, apache uses the whole machine resources while tomcat isn't (CPU usage 100% to 20%) and for maybe this reason isn't

RE: Just another Benchmark

2001-03-02 Thread Ron Pitts
: 02 March 2001 09:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Just another Benchmark Hi, we tried the apachebench on our solaris system, to check out differences between architectures and thereby we found a quite interesting behaviour. When serving a static page, apache uses the whole machine resources

Re: Just another Benchmark

2001-03-02 Thread cmanolache
Well, there is a possible explanation :-) The static interceptor ( which serves static files ) was never tuned or optimized. It probably does multiple accesses to disk, while in Apache there are a number of low-level optimizations, caching, etc. I am not very interested in spending time tuning

RE: Just another Benchmark

2001-03-02 Thread Roy Wilson
Hi, See below. Roy snip -Original Message- From: Thomas Bezdicek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 March 2001 09:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Just another Benchmark Hi, we tried the apachebench on our solaris system, to check out differences between architectures

Re: Just another Benchmark

2001-03-02 Thread Jon Stevens
on 3/2/01 11:58 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For "real" production servers I hope you'll use Apache, and for embeding tomcat in apps or development you don't need 500 requests per seconde. What if we need 500 requests per second for non-static files? :-) -jon

Re: Just another Benchmark

2001-03-02 Thread cmanolache
on 3/2/01 11:58 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For "real" production servers I hope you'll use Apache, and for embeding tomcat in apps or development you don't need 500 requests per seconde. What if we need 500 requests per second for non-static files? :-) You got

Re: Just another Benchmark

2001-03-02 Thread Jon Stevens
on 3/3/01 6:55 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 3/2/01 11:58 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For "real" production servers I hope you'll use Apache, and for embeding tomcat in apps or development you don't need 500 requests per seconde. What if we need

Re: Just another Benchmark

2001-03-02 Thread cmanolache
what platform/os? i believe your previous claims have been on NT, is this also for unix now as well? I've never tried on NT - and it would be pretty difficult anyway ( to get NT on my computer :-) I'm using Linux/JDK1.3. Again, I'm talking about overhead - i.e. the time spent in tomcat (