Remy Maucherat wrote:
Since there are apparently diverging opinions on the subject (and also since
I didn't get any +1s for a possible 4.0.3 b1, or a 4.0.2a release), here's a
formal request for vote.
On the security problem reported yesterday, affecting the security manager
sandboxing.
Since there are apparently diverging opinions on the subject
(and also since
I didn't get any +1s for a possible 4.0.3 b1, or a 4.0.2a
release), here's a
formal request for vote.
On the security problem reported yesterday, affecting the
security manager
sandboxing. We should:
ballot
A [ ]
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4.0.2a + 4.0.3b1 :)
Just to be a pain in the ass I don't really like the concept of an A
version (never happened in httpd land)... So, I would call them 4.0.3 and
4.0.4b1
My $ 0.02
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4.0.2a + 4.0.3b1 :)
Just to be a pain in the ass I don't really like the concept of an A
version (never happened in httpd land)... So, I would call them 4.0.3 and
4.0.4b1
He's right...
However a small
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4.0.2a + 4.0.3b1 :)
Just to be a pain in the ass I don't really like the
concept of an A
version (never happened in httpd land)... So, I would call
them 4.0.3 and
4.0.4b1
Ok let's do 'a la HTTPd', 4.0.3
Just to be a pain in the ass I don't really like the
concept of an A
version (never happened in httpd land)... So, I would call
them 4.0.3 and
4.0.4b1
Ok let's do 'a la HTTPd', 4.0.3 (fix security problems in 4.0.2)
and 4.0.4b1
Thanks for the feedback.
It will then be 4.0.3 + 4.0.4b1 +
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Just to be a pain in the ass I don't really like the
concept of an A
version (never happened in httpd land)... So, I would call
them 4.0.3 and
4.0.4b1
Ok let's do 'a la HTTPd', 4.0.3 (fix security problems in 4.0.2)
and 4.0.4b1
Thanks
Hi Remy and gang..
Below is my non-binding vote (for fun!):
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Since there are apparently diverging opinions on the subject (and also since
I didn't get any +1s for a possible 4.0.3 b1, or a 4.0.2a release), here's a
formal request for vote.
On the security problem
+1 for option A and B together (they don't have to be mutually exclusive,
and we can examine user behavior to see if binary patches are an idea
worth pursuing.
+1 for 4.0.3-b1.
Craig
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:09:08 -0800
From: Remy Maucherat
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:09 AM
Subject: [4.0.3] [VOTES] Upcoming release and security fix
ballot
A [+0] Make a full 4.0.3 (or 4.0.2a) release which would only include the
security fix
B
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On the security problem reported yesterday, affecting the security manager
sandboxing. We should:
ballot
A [] Make a full 4.0.3 (or 4.0.2a) release which would only include the
security fix
B [+1] Make the security fix available as a binary patch
11 matches
Mail list logo