Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons - web connector

2001-03-16 Thread Dan Milstein
For those who don't read jakarta-general (myself included), a draft of The 'Commons Proposal' can be found at: http://husted.com/about/commons/ -Dan GOMEZ Henri wrote: This can happen only if all of you agree ( and also Craig, Pier and Remy who are working on connectors too on the 4.0

RE: [PROPOSAL] The Commons - web connector

2001-03-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I don't see the advantages to having a separate project for the connectors. Can someone explain that to me? The main disadvantage that I see is that the connectors and Tomcat are very tightly linked. Why did you want the connector and Tomcat so tightly linked ? Take for example, mod_perl,

RE: [PROPOSAL] The Commons - web connector

2001-03-15 Thread cmanolache
Dan, Henri, Remember the goal - to have a high quality connector and servlet container. Whatever brings us closer to that is good. Right now there are 3-4 people fixing bugs and working on mod_jk - and you 2 have probably the most knowledge about it. I was hoping that by moving it in a

RE: [PROPOSAL] The Commons - web connector

2001-03-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
This can happen only if all of you agree ( and also Craig, Pier and Remy who are working on connectors too on the 4.0 side ). The goal of the proposal was to include all people involved on connectors from TC 3.1 up to 4.0. After reading the 'Commons Proposal' in jakarta-general I was

RE: [PROPOSAL] The Commons - web connector

2001-03-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Costin ( BTW, I already have a prototype and a name for the combined thing :-) Could you tell us what's the proposed name ?

Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons - web connector

2001-03-14 Thread Dan Milstein
I don't see the advantages to having a separate project for the connectors. Can someone explain that to me? The main disadvantage that I see is that the connectors and Tomcat are very tightly linked -- I think having one developer list for TC and the connectors makes a lot of sense. I think

Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons - web connector

2001-03-14 Thread cmanolache
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Dan Milstein wrote: I don't see the advantages to having a separate project for the connectors. Can someone explain that to me? I don't think the proposal meant a separate top level project, with separate list, etc. It meant to decouple mod_jk and the connector from

RE: [PROPOSAL] The Commons - web connector

2001-03-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Still no response for this sub-project proposal. The upcoming PMC could be an occasion to speak about it. I saw at least 4 potentials commiters working on it : - Dan Milstein, our resident hacker/expert of mod_jk. - Keith Wannamaker, webdav specialist - Pier P. Fumagalli, mod_jserv and

RE: [PROPOSAL] The Commons - web connector

2001-03-13 Thread cmanolache
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Still no response for this sub-project proposal. A big +1 This will also reduce the pressure on making changes in the "stable" code. If a bug is found in the connector - we can just make a new release of the connector ( both sides ), without a need to