>Thanks for the encouraged news. We've been using Tomcat in
>our product
>for a while now. Now, I need to set it up with support for
>minimum 100K
>simultaneous connection to our server side.
100K simultaneous connection !
I doubt any hardware/software/os (even on high system)
could h
Dunlop, Aaron wrote:
> Mathias,
>
> It would be great to see some details on your experiences with
> load-balancing Tomcat, and any tricks you've come up with would be much
> appreciated by the community (well, at least my part of it ;)
>
> We also run Tomcat 4.0 in production, behind a hardware
ay, June 25, 2002 11:23 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)
>
[snip]
> > Well, I know quite a few people who managed to get tomcat in
> > production on a variety of sites ( including very large loads).
>
> I run Tomcat o
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Huy Tran wrote:
> Mathias,
>
> Thanks for the encouraged news. We've been using Tomcat in our product
> for a while now. Now, I need to set it up with support for minimum 100K
> simultaneous connection to our server side. If you could share some of
> your knowledge how
Mathias,
Thanks for the encouraged news. We've been using Tomcat in our product
for a while now. Now, I need to set it up with support for minimum 100K
simultaneous connection to our server side. If you could share some of
your knowledge how you did it with your site, it would be tremendous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> > >> Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how
> > >> it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ?
> > >
> > >As far as I can remember it was voted -1...
> >
> > What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ?
>
> TC5.0 will h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
>
Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how
it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ?
>>>
>>>As far as I can remember it was voted -1...
>>
>>What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ?
>
>
> TC5.0 will have a 'hig
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, John Trollinger wrote:
> Although Pier is sometimes harsh with his words he does have some valid
> points. I would be nice for tomcat to be somewhat modular so if all you
> want is a servlet engine just get those components. This also goes with
> moving the CVS repositories
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, John Trollinger wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:19:40 -0400
> From: John Trollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sub
Although Pier is sometimes harsh with his words he does have some valid
points. I would be nice for tomcat to be somewhat modular so if all you
want is a servlet engine just get those components. This also goes with
moving the CVS repositories.. so you can get only the modules you want
and build
10 matches
Mail list logo
