RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2002-12-19 Thread Donald Ball
On 12/19/2002 at 4:02 PM Martin Algesten wrote: >The problem with this bug is that there are people here who don't agree >it is a bug... which is just plain ignorant and stupid... THIS IS A >BUGIT NEEDS FIXING! Thank you - now I at least know that other people have observed this behavior and

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2002-12-19 Thread Martin Algesten
The problem with this bug is that there are people here who don't agree it is a bug... which is just plain ignorant and stupid... THIS IS A BUGIT NEEDS FIXING! I've tried get this one sorted as well... however, either someone will tell you they don't agree it is a bug and/or they will just ign

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2002-12-23 Thread Donald Ball
Are any tomcat developers going to express any interest in this issue? I frankly consider being completely ignored to be quite rude and a poor way to interact with the at-large developer community. - donald On 12/19/2002 at 12:13 PM Donald Ball wrote: >On 12/19/2002 at 4:02 PM Martin Algesten wr

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2002-12-23 Thread Costin Manolache
It is on my todo list ( I also need this to work, at least for 500 ). Do you have a patch ? Costin Donald Ball wrote: > Are any tomcat developers going to express any interest in this issue? I > frankly consider being completely ignored to be quite rude and a poor way > to interact with the at-l

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2002-12-27 Thread Donald Ball
On 12/23/2002 at 9:40 AM Costin Manolache wrote: >It is on my todo list ( I also need this to work, at least for 500 ). >Do you have a patch ? not yet, but i'll be happy to work on one for 4.1.x. thanks for taking the time to respond. - donald -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2003-01-02 Thread Donald Ball
On 12/23/2002 at 9:40 AM Costin Manolache wrote: >It is on my todo list ( I also need this to work, at least for 500 ). >Do you have a patch ? I have attached an erstwhile patch to the bug in bugzilla. It assumes the content type of the error-page resource to be text/html and uses rd.include inst

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Donald Ball wrote: > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:26:10 -0500 > From: Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: error-page status codes b

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2003-01-02 Thread Donald Ball
On 1/2/2003 at 9:23 AM Craig R. McClanahan wrote: >> Nonetheless, I think the patched behavior is much more correct than the >> current behavior and should be applied to cvs. >> > >(Sorry for being out of touch earlier -- holidays and busyness and such). > >I do not agree with the assertion that t

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Donald Ball wrote: > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 12:49:40 -0500 > From: Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: erro

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2003-01-02 Thread Donald Ball
>The key issue is that declaring an handler ***replaces*** the >standard container behavior; it doesn't ***augment*** it. > >Consider, for example, a webapp that want to implement something like what >the "Redirect" configuration parameter does for Apache (so that old URLs >still work). In today'