Sandy McArthur wrote:
On Jul 14, 2004, at 11:17 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
jk 1.2.6 seems to be in a good shape and a release should be welcome
for many users.
I'd like to release jk 1.2.6 next week.
Any objections ?
I have one gripe with the way mod_jk chooses the session tracking cookie.
I'm not a
nyhgan wrote:
Hi,
Does mod_jk 1.0.26 fix the following problem? I believe that it is the one of the most important issues with the mod_jk.
What's the exact problem ?
I'm using jk 1.2.5 with Apache 2.0 and Tomcat 3.3.2 and handle about
300 000 req/days and never got this problem.
Explain and
Sandy McArthur wrote:
On Jul 14, 2004, at 11:17 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
jk 1.2.6 seems to be in a good shape and a release should be welcome
for many users.
I'd like to release jk 1.2.6 next week.
Any objections ?
I have one gripe with the way mod_jk chooses the session tracking cookie.
I'm not a
nyhgan wrote:
-
What's the exact problem ?
I'm using jk 1.2.5 with Apache 2.0 and Tomcat 3.3.2 and handle about
300 000 req/days and never got this problem.
Explain and detail please.
-
Hi, Henri Gomez
Tomcat
nyhgan wrote:
Tomcat 3.3.2 and jk1.2.5 is what I am using now and it runs fine. The
problem described emails below only occurs if you use jk1.2.x with Tomcat
5.x (or 4.x). And because of this reasonI can't upgrade my Tomcat to
Tomcat5.x.
This sounds like more of a problem in your application
jk 1.2.6 seems to be in a good shape and a release should be welcome
for many users.
I'd like to release jk 1.2.6 next week.
Any objections ?
Vote please ;-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Hi,
No objections: on the contrary, +1 ;)
(And a general +1 to mod_* work and releases)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 11:17 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: mod_jk 1.0.26
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
No objections: on the contrary, +1 ;)
(And a general +1 to mod_* work and releases)
Yes, we have a slower release rate :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jk 1.2.6 seems to be in a good shape and a release should be welcome
for many users.
I'd like to release jk 1.2.6 next week.
Any objections ?
Vote please ;-)
+1
-
To unsubscribe,
cool status and it works fine,
+1
Thanx
peter
Henri Gomez schrieb:
jk 1.2.6 seems to be in a good shape and a release should be welcome
for many users.
I'd like to release jk 1.2.6 next week.
Any objections ?
Vote please ;-)
-
To
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 8:17 AM
Subject: mod_jk 1.0.26 release ?
jk 1.2.6 seems to be in a good shape and a release should be welcome
for many users.
I'd like to release jk
On Jul 14, 2004, at 11:17 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
jk 1.2.6 seems to be in a good shape and a release should be welcome
for many users.
I'd like to release jk 1.2.6 next week.
Any objections ?
I have one gripe with the way mod_jk chooses the session tracking
cookie.
I'm not a dev but I just
Good catch :).
This should be easy enough to get into 1.2.6.
- Original Message -
From: Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk 1.0.26 release ? - session tracking cookie
On Jul 14
Hi,
Does mod_jk 1.0.26 fix the following problem? I believe that it is the one of the
most important issues with the mod_jk.
nyhgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly. I have been on this user list for months and I still haven't seen anyone
solve the mod_jk connector issue for
14 matches
Mail list logo
