Tomcat 5 notably slower than tomcat 4...more info

2004-12-05 Thread Dan Foreman
Hi, I've learned more since my last questions about tomcat 5 vs 4 performance. The reason that it seems so much slower is that there are more than twice as many packets being returned from the application server...most of which are SYN/SYN-ACK packets (no exaggeration, from 300 packets in

RE: Tomcat/Java and SMP

2004-12-03 Thread Dan Foreman
? Dan Foreman wrote: Hi, I have a setup of 10 application servers using Tomcat 4/5, jsdk 1.4.2_02, SMP, win2k. In watching the performance under load I am concerned that only one CPU is being utilized at a time. To validate my theory I try hitting the application server with a request

RE: Tomcat/Java and SMP

2004-12-03 Thread Dan Foreman
. -Original Message- From: Kwok Peng Tuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 6:53 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat/Java and SMP Dan, U have 10 application servers on one machine or 10 application on 10 distinct machines ? Dan Foreman wrote: Hi

FW: Tomcat 5 notably slower than tomcat 4

2004-12-02 Thread Dan Foreman
Hi, While upgrading application servers from Tomcat 4.0.5 to Tomcat 5.0.29 I am noticing slower browser response when hitting the tomcat 5 servers. We use tomcat as an application server for a data collection application. In one of our larger installs where there are 10 application servers,

Tomcat/Java and SMP

2004-12-02 Thread Dan Foreman
Hi, I have a setup of 10 application servers using Tomcat 4/5, jsdk 1.4.2_02, SMP, win2k. In watching the performance under load I am concerned that only one CPU is being utilized at a time. To validate my theory I try hitting the application server with a request to generate a large report

RE: Tomcat/Java and SMP

2004-12-02 Thread Dan Foreman
Message - From: Dan Foreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat-User [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 10:40 PM Subject: Tomcat/Java and SMP Hi, I have a setup of 10 application servers using Tomcat 4/5, jsdk 1.4.2_02, SMP, win2k. In watching the performance under load I am