On Jan 6, 2005, at 12:07 PM, Wade Chandler wrote:
I don't know the answer...figured I would try to give you help in
thinking about the issue.
Thanks! That was just the kind of thinking I was hoping to hear. If
not an answer, then it sure helps to get ideas of other ways of
experimenting.
==L
On Jan 6, 2005, at 11:03 AM, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
Looks like this is not related the the secure nature (digitally
signed) of the cookie, but the size. A cookie over about 3k will
trigger this problem.
Resolved this by increasing the bufferSize and maxHttpHeaderSize in the
Tomcat
seems like it could be
that Tomcat isn't logging in the part of the code that this is hitting.
Is this a problem in Java SSL?
Thanks for any help you can offer!
==Leonard
On Jan 5, 2005, at 10:58 AM, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
I have configured Tomcat 5.0.27 on the localhost to accept https
conn
I have configured Tomcat 5.0.27 on the localhost to accept https
connections (I have configured an unsigned cert under the alias
"tomcat" to allow this).
I can then get to the root Tomcat page at https://localhost:8443/.
If my browser happens to have a signed cookie in it (this cookie is a
sig
Hi,
The server.xml in Tomcat 5 has inside of .
Right now, I'm running one host in the Tomcat configuration on each of
two computers. server.xml in tomcat running on a computer named c1 has
a named c1, and computer c2 has a host named c2.
I'm planning to create several virtual hosts that will
On May 28, 2004, at 7:15 AM, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
On May 27, 2004, at 12:43 PM, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
On May 27, 2004, at 10:05 AM, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
But, the number of Sessions is 140.
The number appears to have fluctuations up and down, but the overall
trend is to increase. There
Tomcat will be restarted on Thursday, June 3rd, at 8pm, in order to
switch to a new version of WEQC.
Applications affected:
www.people.ucar.edu (WEQC)
webmail
SKIL
Downtime should be less that 5 minutes.
==Leonard E. Sitongia
VETS / Scientific Computing Division
National Center for Atmospheri
On May 27, 2004, at 12:43 PM, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
On May 27, 2004, at 10:05 AM, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
But, the number of Sessions is 140.
The number appears to have fluctuations up and down, but the overall
trend is to increase. There are now 170 sessions. Some sessions
apparently expire
On May 27, 2004, at 10:05 AM, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
But, the number of Sessions is 140.
The number appears to have fluctuations up and down, but the overall
trend is to increase. There are now 170 sessions. Some sessions
apparently expire but others do not, hence the overall increase.
Is
Hello,
I find that the number of Sessions displayed by the Manager is
surprisingly high. My application has the session timeout set to 5.
The access_log shows 8 hits in the last five minutes. But, the number
of Sessions is 140.
I'm running Tomcat 5.0.19 on Solaris 5.9. I use two servers in
Hi,
Could I get some pointers into incorporating my own authentication into
Tomcat's container managed security while using a JDBC realm for just
the role information?
We have a local authentication mechanism that provides an API with a
class, for example, that returns a boolean given a userna
ite a filter and add that to the manager web.xml to perform the extra
> acl needs
> 3) Write a perl(or pick your fav lang) wrapper that does all the ACL work
> then it calls the manager app URLS for you.
>
> -Tim
>
> Leonard Sitongia wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm
Hi!
I'm looking for ideas, conventions, or standard approaches to giving people
control over Tomcat Manager operations that are specific to particular
applications. This could involve virtual hosts, realms, and such, but I want
to avoid setting up multiple servers, JVMs and such.
I would like
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 09:58 am, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
> Am I missing something obvious here? Is it not possible to set the
> permissions?
I think the answer here is "yes", I'm missing something obvious. Just dawned
on me that it must be the umask setting the p
On Monday 18 November 2002 10:47 am, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
> How do I control the Unix file permissions that are set for the log files
> that are created by Tomcat? They end up mode 600. I would like them to be
> 644 so that developers can read the log files.
Hello again,
Am
Hello,
I'm running Tomcat 4.1.14 (not 4.1.12 due to the SSL problem there), although
I don't know if this question is specific to that release. It's running on
Sun Solaris.
How do I control the Unix file permissions that are set for the log files that
are created by Tomcat? They end up mode
16 matches
Mail list logo
