I might be wrong but wouldn't you need at least a 1.2 jvm for the
servlet/jsp architecture. I'm pretty sure others will agree. Give that a
whirl. 1.3.1 is the latest fully supported JVM.
>From: Matthew Oatham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'[EMAIL
>From: Steven Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: measuring round trip time
>Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:49:58 +0100
>
>On 12/06/02 17:03, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t;- Original Message -
>From: "Rui Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:49 PM
>Subject: RE: Tomcat does not Auto-reload.
>
>
> > When is this destroy me
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Tomcat does not Auto-reload.
>Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:49:29 +0100
>
>When is this destroy method invoked? If I copy the newer version of the
>servlet to the WEB-INF/classes
That's due in part to the servlet architectures caching mechanism. Typically
we added a method to each servlet to destroy it. I don't know if there's a
better method than that though as I know I would like to see one because
they bith seem a bit ghetto.
Regards!
>From: "Rui Oliveira" <[EMAIL
Your JAVA_HOME environment variable should be set to c:\jdk1.3 and not
c:\jdk1.3\bin and that should solve it.
Regards!
>From: puneet sachar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: help me Date: Wed, 12 Jun
