Re: Antw: Re: Tomcat Newsgroup?

2002-11-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, craig franke wrote: > Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:11:35 -0600 > From: craig franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Antw: Re: Tomcat Newsgroup? > > A digest option w

Re: Antw: Re: Tomcat Newsgroup?

2002-11-20 Thread craig franke
A digest option would be nice for those who prefer getting emails in that format. I'd rather get several tomcat emails at a time I think as opposed to the several hundred that I get in a week. [And my network administrator would probably be less vocal on how many emails I receive a day :)] --

Re: Antw: Re: Tomcat Newsgroup?

2002-11-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Andre Schild wrote: > Perhaps we should splitt the tomcat mailinglist a bit more, so each > list gets less traffic. That idea has been tried by many different groups for many different projects over many years, and tends to fail at accomplishing the theoretical goals of red

Antw: Re: Tomcat Newsgroup?

2002-11-20 Thread Andre Schild
>As it happens, there's some experimental work on a two-way mail+newsreader >solution for Jakarta mailing lists. That's probably ok (although we'll >end up with a lot more off-topic posts from users that haven't read the >list descriptions on the web site), but newsgroup-only would be a really >ba