> From: Charles Fineman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FAQ? shutdown.bat not killing java process on Windows
>
> Is there another mechanism I ought to be using to initialize
> (arbitrary) resources for my webapp?
A context listener might be what you're looking for
server fields the request and shuts
> > down a bunch of
> > services (as evidenced by the messages I see). Sure enough, the server
> no
> > longer responds to any requests. Unfortunately, the java process does
> not
> > die.
> >
> > I have this problem whethe
Why bother IBM. In my startup script, I clean up any java process:
for i in `ps ax --format ppid,pid,cmd |grep java |egrep
"^[[:space:]]*1[[:space:]]" |tr -s ' ' |cut -f3 -d" "`
do
echo "killing $i..."
kill -9 $i
done
-Original Message
gt;>
> >>To see a dump of the threads still active after you've run shutdown.bat
> >>do a CTRL-BREAK in the tomcat dos console.
> >>
> >>HTH,
> >>
> >>Jon
> >>
> >>Charles Fineman wrote:
> >>
> >>
>
ve run shutdown.bat
>>do a CTRL-BREAK in the tomcat dos console.
>>
>>HTH,
>>
>>Jon
>>
>>Charles Fineman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I started Tomcat using startup.bat. Everything goes fine. I use
>>>shutdown.batto bring it down. The serv
s (as evidenced by the messages I see). Sure enough, the server no
> > longer responds to any requests. Unfortunately, the java process does not
> > die.
> >
> > I have this problem whether I start Tomcat by hand or if I use the Sysdeo
> > Eclipse plugin.
> >
>
neman wrote:
>
>> I started Tomcat using startup.bat. Everything goes fine. I use
>> shutdown.batto bring it down. The server fields the request and shuts
>> down a bunch of
>> services (as evidenced by the messages I see). Sure enough, the
>> server no
>> long
. Unfortunately, the java process does not
die.
I have this problem whether I start Tomcat by hand or if I use the Sysdeo
Eclipse plugin.
This problem has been a thorn in my side for some time but since it only
affects my development environment (we use it as a service in production and
there are no
I started Tomcat using startup.bat. Everything goes fine. I use
shutdown.batto bring it down. The server fields the request and shuts
down a bunch of
services (as evidenced by the messages I see). Sure enough, the server no
longer responds to any requests. Unfortunately, the java process does not
Hi, am actually using tomcat version 5.0.28 on Red Hat Linux 6.2.
What i've notice is that each time i compile my java classes, copy them to
/WEB-INF/classes dir. and then redeploy my web application consisting of jsp
pages, I saw the number of java process increases when I do a 'ps -aux
> Wade Chandler wrote:
>
>> Mark Maigatter wrote:
>>
>>> We have a Tomcat 5.0.25 based web site for uploading images and assorted
>>> files and managing them.
>>>
>>> We have found that the Java process that Tomcat is running under is
&g
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Java process growth under Linux...leak?
We have a Tomcat 5.0.25 based web site for uploading images and assorted
files and managing them.
We have found that the Java process that Tomcat is running under is
gradually growing when repetitively processing file
Wade Chandler wrote:
Mark Maigatter wrote:
We have a Tomcat 5.0.25 based web site for uploading images and assorted
files and managing them.
We have found that the Java process that Tomcat is running under is
gradually growing when repetitively processing files uploaded and
stripped
out of the
Mark Maigatter wrote:
We have a Tomcat 5.0.25 based web site for uploading images and assorted
files and managing them.
We have found that the Java process that Tomcat is running under is
gradually growing when repetitively processing files uploaded and stripped
out of the form submissions by
We have a Tomcat 5.0.25 based web site for uploading images and assorted
files and managing them.
We have found that the Java process that Tomcat is running under is
gradually growing when repetitively processing files uploaded and stripped
out of the form submissions by the Apache FileUpload
Howdy,
>Do you know of an open-source implementation that does provide process
>pooling? (Synchronization alone isn't good enough in my case as I want
to
>spread the work over multiple processors.)
I personally don't. Most of the java developers I know balk enough at
using Processes, they try
ginal Message -
From: "Yoav Shapira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: Java Process Pool
> Howdy,
> Commons-pool is a generic pooling framework. It's not specific (and
rg/commons/pool/
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:40 PM
> Subject: RE: Java Process Pool
>
>
>
> Howdy,
> Yo
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/pool/
- Original Message -
From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:40 PM
Subject: RE: Java Process Pool
Howdy,
You can use commons-pool fo
I got it. Thanks.
I'm not the original poster, I was just wondering.
Oscar
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> >I'm just wondering what's the "risky" part. Is database pooling any
> >different than this idea, in that you are still dependent on something
> >outside of Java
Howdy,
>I'm just wondering what's the "risky" part. Is database pooling any
>different than this idea, in that you are still dependent on something
>outside of Java mis-behaving and is platform-specific.
>
>And would there be anything "non-portable" except for the JNI part,
which
>of course is pl
Shapira
> Millennium ChemInformatics
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: James Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:38 PM
> >To: tomcat users list
> >Subject: Java Process Pool
> >
> >Does anyone know o
t;To: tomcat users list
>Subject: Java Process Pool
>
>Does anyone know of a convenient way to create a Java process pool. A
>thread pool won't work as I am trying to pool some JNI code wrapping a
C
>library that isn't thread safe.
>
>I would rather not have to cr
Does anyone know of a convenient way to create a Java process pool. A thread pool
won't work as I am trying to pool some JNI code wrapping a C library that isn't thread
safe.
I would rather not have to create my own pooling mechanism.
Sincerely,
James Carpenter
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
When I run top command on linux, it is showing memory usage of java process is
two times more than what java heap is taking, I got java heap size inside java program
using "Runtime.getRuntime().totalMemory() - Runtime.getRuntime().freeMemory();"
I didn't under
in a stack trace for each thread.
- Attach a debugger
Wait until this happens again, and look what the threads
are doing.
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Brandon Cruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Montag, 7. Oktober 2002 23:40
> An: Tomcat Users List
> Betreff:
Running Tomcat 3.2.4, Sun JDK 1.3.1_01, AJP13, Apache 1.3.x on Linux. One
java process seems to keep running and take more and more CPU as time goes
on. It just slowly keeps growing and slowing down the system. Right now, I
look and it has been running for 2338 minutes and is taking 48.9% of
age-
From: Joel Maisenhelder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Java Process hanging
Dear Gang,
I am running Tomcat 4.1.10 with java 1.4 on Solaris 8 . I am having
trouble shutting down the tomcat server. I do a shutdown.sh
"ps -aef | grep java" I still see the java process running and if I do
a start I get another java process wich does not go away with a
shutdown so after a little while I have lots of java process runnning
and I must do a pkill java on them to get rid of them . Is there any
9-02, you wrote:
>Hi all:
>
>When I start catalina in Linux, I type:
>
>ps aux |grep java
>
>And The system has 36 java process but the java process grows...
>
>Can you help me, please?
>
>Is it normal?
>
>Thank you very much.
>
>
>Ángel
--
To unsubsc
Hi all:
When I start catalina in Linux, I type:
ps aux |grep java
And The system has 36 java process but the java process grows...
Can you help me, please?
Is it normal?
Thank you very much.
Ángel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands,
I saw similar problem when my DB process is locked due to lock on
resources. This is not a fancy way but we gave work around to make sure we
don't end up with two servers. This can be done easily by checking for
'java....' process running for this user in the start/stop scr
Make sure you do not have any servlets or beans creating non-daemon
threads. A java process will run while there exists at least 1
non-daemon thread.
Perform a thread dump on your java process and see if this is the case.
See previous threads (or google) on how to perform a thread dump.
Jim
the java command. I do not know if there is a similar option for
solaris. java -X should tell you
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Michael Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 8:23 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat shutdown does not kill java process
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jim Coble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 30. August 2002 16:18
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Tomcat shutdown does not kill java process
>
>
> I'm running Tomcat 4.0.3 stand-alone on a Solaris 8 ser
y, August 30, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: Tomcat shutdown does not kill java process
>
> - Forwarded by Jim Coble/Libraries/Provost/Academic/Univ/Duke on
> 08/30/2002 10:18 AM -
>
> Jim Coble
>To:
[EMAIL PROTEC
:
AM Subject: Tomcat shutdown does not kill
java process
Message -
From: "Randy Layman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:30 AM
Subject: RE: JAVA Process on Solaris 8 is taking 52M
>
> 52MB is a little on the low side for out installation
, 2002 9:30
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JAVA Process on Solaris 8 is taking 52M
52MB is a little on the low side for out installations, and I've
never seen Tomcat run with 8MB. Does the Win2K system actually work?
Randy
> -Original Message-
&g
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: JAVA Process on Solaris 8 is taking 52M
>
>
> Hi everybody,
> Did install tomcat with the WARP Connector to Apache on Solaris 8 and
> Windows 2000.
> The JAVA.EXE (tomcat process) is taking 8Mb on Windows 2000
> and 52Mb o
Hi everybody,
Did install tomcat with the WARP Connector to Apache on Solaris 8 and
Windows 2000.
The JAVA.EXE (tomcat process) is taking 8Mb on Windows 2000 and 52Mb on
Solaris.
Is it normal
Thanks,
Sam
in general (this is what it's meant for anyway),
which translates into larger Java process/heap size but less
noticeable GC pauses.
Hope this helps,
--V.
- Original Message -
From: "Roy K. Mayr R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday,
Hi,
I'm working with Solaris 8, Tomcat 3.3b, jdk 1.3.1, and Apache...
When I start tomcat, java process use 16M and when I run JSP pages this
process grow more, more, more
I start java with options:
export TOMCAT_OPTS=" -server -verbosegc -Xincgc -Xmx150m"
What is wro
yea i thought they were threads. i suppose my question was if all
47 were necc. and if not could i lower the amount of them.
pete
"Rui M . Silva Seabra" wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:17:40PM -0400, Pete Wright
wrote:
> this is for a development machine that's pretty
> underpowered so obvious
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:17:40PM -0400, Pete Wright wrote:
> this is for a development machine that's pretty
> underpowered so obviously i'd love the conserve resources. should i
> even worry about all that java stuff?
I think they're threads, but if you have low power machines, mayhap you sho
Hey all,
I've got apache 1.3.19 running with tomcat 3.2.1
on debian/gnu linux
(potato). everything went great with the install!
ok got a quick question here tho, i start tomcat then do a ps -A to
make
sure it's running and notice that i have *a*lot* of java process'
running
46 matches
Mail list logo
