RE: JDK 1.3.0...

2001-07-17 Thread Everitt, Andrew
TECTED]] > Sent: 17 July 2001 14:05 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: JDK 1.3.0... > > > I have 1.3.0_02 for linux if you want - or anyone else for > that matter. > > [dim@dim dim]$ java -version > java version "1.3.0_02" &

RE: JDK 1.3.0...

2001-07-17 Thread Cory Powers
Or go to the archive at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/index.html -Original Message- From: Everitt, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:35 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: JDK 1.3.0... All olg JDKs are available on the Sun site, you

Re: JDK 1.3.0...

2001-07-17 Thread Adam Fowler
That'd be great 8o) Adam. On Tuesday 17 July 2001 13:05, you wrote: > I have 1.3.0_02 for linux if you want - or anyone else for that matter. > > [dim@dim dim]$ java -version > java version "1.3.0_02" > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0_02) > Java HotSpot(TM) Client V

Re: JDK 1.3.0...

2001-07-17 Thread Adam Fowler
ay, July 17, 2001 10:35 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: JDK 1.3.0... > > > All olg JDKs are available on the Sun site, you just have to know where to > look, try going to: > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3.0/ > > Cheers, > Andi > __

Sun JDK 1.3.0 and multiple 'java' startups?

2000-10-25 Thread David Knaack
Greetings, I'm running Tomcat 3.1 with several virtual hosts, and with Sun's JDK1.2.2 I had no problems. However, I needed to upgrade to JDK1.3.0 for another package, and now when I start up Tomcat I'm getting about 11 instances of 'java' starting along with each virtual host. With 5 virtual ho

SSL on Tomcat 4.0 with IBM JDK 1.3.0

2001-12-19 Thread Mihai Gheorghiu
I managed to start Tomcat 4.0.1 on my RH 7.0 box only after I replaced Sun's JDK 1.3.1 with IBM's JDK 1.3.0. This also avoids errors in some other packages (I'm experimenting with Velocity). So, if I want to have an SSL connection to TC 4.0.1 on IBM JDK 1.3.0, what do I need to do

Re: Sun JDK 1.3.0 and multiple 'java' startups?

2000-10-25 Thread David Knaack
From: "David Knaack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm running Tomcat 3.1 with several virtual hosts, and > with Sun's JDK1.2.2 I had no problems. Oops, I should mention that I'm running on RedHat 6.2.

Re: Sun JDK 1.3.0 and multiple 'java' startups?

2000-10-25 Thread Elijah Roberts
On Wednesday October 25, 2000 David Knaack wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm running Tomcat 3.1 with several virtual hosts, and > with Sun's JDK1.2.2 I had no problems. However, I needed > to upgrade to JDK1.3.0 for another package, and now when > I start up Tomcat I'm getting about 11 instances of 'j

Re: Sun JDK 1.3.0 and multiple 'java' startups?

2000-10-25 Thread Paul Russell
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 03:15:51PM -0500, David Knaack wrote: > From: "David Knaack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm running Tomcat 3.1 with several virtual hosts, and > > with Sun's JDK1.2.2 I had no problems. > Oops, I should mention that I'm running on RedHat 6.2. Heh. In which case, don't panic

Re: Sun JDK 1.3.0 and multiple 'java' startups?

2000-10-25 Thread David Knaack
From: "Elijah Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Are using jdk1.3 for Linux? If so they aren't really processes, they're > threads. Ah yes, now that you mention it I seem to recall reading something about that in the 1.3.0 docs. > It's just that in Linux with the ps command it lists each thread > as

Re: Sun JDK 1.3.0 and multiple 'java' startups?

2000-10-25 Thread David Knaack
From: "Paul Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 03:15:51PM -0500, David Knaack wrote: > > From: "David Knaack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I'm running Tomcat 3.1 with several virtual hosts, and > > > with Sun's JDK1.2.2 I had no problems. > > Oops, I should mention that I'm runn

Re: Sun JDK 1.3.0 and multiple 'java' startups?

2000-10-25 Thread Paul Russell
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 04:21:13PM -0500, David Knaack wrote: > Kind of looks like the threads are reported as using the > same resources as the parent, so each set of 11 related > java threads all report ~12Mb used, (summing to over > 130Mb), when the correct figure is actually closer to 12Mb > t

Re: Sun JDK 1.3.0 and multiple 'java' startups?

2000-10-26 Thread David Knaack
From: "Paul Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 04:21:13PM -0500, David Knaack wrote: > That's not *too* bad. Linux caches stuff. lots. If you've got > a lot of ram free for a while, you'll end up with half your > inode tables and blocks in ram. Its back down to 6Mb free this

[tomcat-user] Re: Sun JDK 1.3.0 and multiple 'java' startups?

2000-10-25 Thread kenneth topp
try: ps -ajH the PGID will always be the same for multiple threads of an app. (disclaimer: PGID could be the same of other types of apps (but not normally) and I don't know what happens to PGID when a thread exec's, but neither does posix, so I don't care). Kenneth Topp --- to unsubscribe

[tomcat-user] Re: Sun JDK 1.3.0 and multiple 'java' startups?

2000-10-25 Thread kenneth topp
okay.. memory usage now. 3 things to note. 1) What you see is not what is happening (under unix). Here is a good general guide (although written as reference for GNOME project): http://mail.gnome.org/pipermail/gnome-list/1999-September/031795.html 2) Java allocates memory for it's own purpo

Problem with TOMCAT 3.3 : can't find tools.jar of my JDK 1.3.0

2001-12-03 Thread LEBRETON Philippe
I have install TOMCAT 3.3 and jdk 1.3.0 TOMCAT_HOME and JAVA_HOME is set. and when i go to the examples URL i have a error : java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/tools/javac/Main i start tomcat with : bin/tomcat.sh start, and the display that CLASSPATH= $TOMCAT_HOME/lib nothing for the JDK

Re: Problem with TOMCAT 3.3 : can't find tools.jar of my JDK 1.3.0

2001-12-03 Thread David Morsberger
Philippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: CTI des Pays de Loire > Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 11:22:05 +0100 > To: Tomcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Problem with TOMCAT 3.3 : can't find tools.jar o