On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:19 -0700, Sean Dockery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1
>
> I had been under the impression that JK2 was superior to JK. In light
> of the announcement, should we be sticking with JK from here
IMHO avoid JK2
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:19 -0700, Sean Dockery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially
> unsupported.
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1
>
> We're in the process of config
Thanks for the reply, Dennis.
I did some reading in the list archives on the subject, and we decided to go
with mod_jk.
"Dennis Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It looks like things regarding a connector are still in flux... probably
> not time to panic yet.
It looks like things regarding a connector are still in flux... probably
not time to panic yet. JK2 works. mod_jk works. Choose one.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12-22-2004 17:03 >>>
On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially
unsupported.
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomca
On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially
unsupported.
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1
We're in the process of configuring new servers and integrating Apache with
Tomcat. We are migrating applications from servers runni
