ks with Apache 1.3.x and Apache 2.0.x, and
versions 3 and 4 of tomcat, as far as I know.
John Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: More mod_jk/tomcat integration
John,
Thanks for the clarification. Where can I find a mod_jk.so binary that
works with my 1.3.23 and tomcat 4.0.4?
Btw, how closely tied are modules to particular versions of apache?
Peter
Turner, John wrote:
> If you're using apache with tomcat, there is no benefit to using mod_webapp.
> M
ny performance gains using mod_webapp (from what I can tell), mod_jk
is the right choice.
John Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Feng Zhou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: More mod_jk/tomcat integration
H
ent, and tomcat to server "dynamic"
content, you want mod_jk.
I would remove references to mod_webapp in your configuration.
John Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:55 PM
To: Tomcat Use
Of course, an RPM is not necessary here - I'll settle for a build.
These seem to be missing from the builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors
directory, although there are encouraging messages about how the empty
places will soon be filled. Are we talking days or weeks for this?
Peter
Peter B. West
I have seen a number of questions about this in recent postings in the
archive, so I am in good company.
I am installing tomcat 4.0.4 with apache-1.3.23-11 rpms from redhat on a
redhat 7.3 system. I had previously installed a beta version of 3.3
with the then-current apache, and I had the tra
