> Tomcat can serve static resources just fine. The only
> question is, which
> way supports the minimum performance standard that you need?
> If it does,
> you should set things up that way.
Apologies - I was working on the assumption that the questioner was using
TomCat under Apache already
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Justin Rowles wrote:
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 12:22:38 -
> From: Justin Rowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Apache + mod_
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Rowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: martedì 11 dicembre 2001 13:23
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Apache + mod_jk (ajp13) + Tomcat: no "Expires" header in
> the response
>
>
> > In ge
> In general I agree with you and I never put static HTML pages
> under Tomcat,
> but the pages I'm talking about now are created by Tomcat itself after
> invoking a servlet to store the result of the invocation... I
> didn't like
> the idea that Tomcat would had saved these HTML files under Apa
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: martedì 11 dicembre 2001 12:19
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: AW: Apache + mod_jk (ajp13) + Tomcat: no "Expires" header in
> the response
>
>
>
> Sorry, I don't know enough about mod_expires
> to say anyt
2001 16:59:40 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.20 (Win32) mod_jk/1.1.0
Last-Modified: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:59:37 GMT
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Michele Milani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 10. Dezember 2001 18:23
> > An: &#
This stuff is getting *really* funny! I run it under Windows and it worked.
I compared HTTP headers, the problem is that:
- Apache (under Windows or Linux) does not set "Expires" header for HTML
pages restituted by Tomcat
- Apache _under Linux_ sets a wrong (i.e. old, not updated) "Last-Modifie
