conditions. There is
NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: donderdag 1 september 2005 22:40
> Aan: Tomcat Users List
> Onderwerp: Re: Building M
On 8/30/05, Ivo Van Den Maagdenberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> After the jk/native/common directory is built, make does seems not pass
> through the jk/native/apache-1.3 directory properly. I would appreciate
> some help in getting make this to work.
>
>
> Make output below:
>
> Making all in apach
Jon,
> Is it possible to modify the
settings for mod_jk *after* building it so I can export it to this
server from an internal build machine?
I don't think that mod_jk keeps any settings compiled-in, so you should
be okay. Just to be extra-sure, you should compile it on a machine which
is config
> -Original Message-
> From: Javier Sanchez Monzon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 October 2003 12:12
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: building mod_jk from source - TO GREG -
>
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> i am using make, version: GNU MAKE 3.80
> -?? i don't know
Hi Greg,
i am using make, version: GNU MAKE 3.80
-?? i don't know, if apache was compiled with sun's cc/make/automake
helps you to make conclusions?
regards,
tino
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Jusy a thought;
>
> What varients of automake/cc/make are you using? Was apache complied with
>
Jusy a thought;
What varients of automake/cc/make are you using? Was apache complied with
sun's cc/make/automake and you are using GNU's?
Greg
>
> Hi , dear community
>
> i am fixing slowly my bugs with your help!. This mailing
> list works fine.
>
> I want to build my own mod_jk from sou
That worked, thanks!
On Thursday 16 January 2003 01:46 pm, Turner, John wrote:
> My advice: don't even deal with ant.
>
> CONNECTOR_HOME = place where you put connector source
>
> - cd CONNECTOR_HOME/jk/native. Be sure to READ the file named
> BUILDING. - run the buildconf script: ./buildconf.sh
On Thursday 16 January 2003 01:54 pm, Will Hartung wrote:
> > From: "Stephen Carville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:41 PM
> > Subject: Building Mod_jk on Redhat 7.2
> >
> >
> > I am trying to build mod_jk for Apache 1.3.X running on Redhat
> > 7.2. I downloaded the sou
> From: "Stephen Carville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:41 PM
> Subject: Building Mod_jk on Redhat 7.2
> I am trying to build mod_jk for Apache 1.3.X running on Redhat 7.2.
> I downloaded the source, read README.txt set the path to tomcat and
> apache in build.properti
My advice: don't even deal with ant.
CONNECTOR_HOME = place where you put connector source
- cd CONNECTOR_HOME/jk/native. Be sure to READ the file named BUILDING.
- run the buildconf script: ./buildconf.sh
- you may see some error messages about aclocal and autom4te...these can be
ignored.
-
09 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: building mod_jk errors...
Might help the list to know where it fails? : ) What is the
error message
it gives?
Denise
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Luc BEAUDET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 9:54 AM
rs List'
> Subject: RE: building mod_jk errors...
>
>
> Might help the list to know where it fails? : ) What is the
> error message
> it gives?
>
> Denise
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Luc BEAUDET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> S
Might help the list to know where it fails? : ) What is the error message
it gives?
Denise
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Luc BEAUDET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 9:54 AM
To: tomcat-user
Subject: building mod_jk errors...
Hi All !
Runnin' SOLARIS 8
/wherever/you/unpacked/the/source/jk/native/BUILDING
In short:
./configure --with-apxs=/some/path/to/apache/bin/apxs
make
John
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:developer@;wexwarez.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject:
-
> > From: "Sean M Alderman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: building mod_jk
> >
> >
> > > I seem to remember seeing somethin
t;Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:35 PM
> Subject: Re: building mod_jk
>
>
> > I seem to remember seeing something in this list about mod_jk not
> > working properly with jdk 1.4. I ultimately ended up downloading the
&
gt;
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: building mod_jk
> I seem to remember seeing something in this list about mod_jk not
> working properly with jdk 1.4. I ultimately ended up downloading the
> binary dist
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:05 PM
> Subject: RE: building mod_jk
>
>
> > Which JDK are you using? Try 1.3.1 I had an incredibly hard time getting
> > mod_jk built.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: building mod_jk
> Which JDK are you using? Try 1.3.1 I had an incredibly hard time getting
> mod_jk built. Also, try building it with the ./configure script. That's
> what worked for me. If you were o
ssage-
From: Jan-Willem Goedheer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:49 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: building mod_jk
Hi Mark,
I've already tried that one, but when I give the ant command I get these
errors:
jkjava:
[echo] Logging:
/usr/local/jaka
Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: building mod_jk
> Try this:
> http://www.galatea.com/flashguides/apache-tomcat-24-unix.xml
>
> It's a little dated but at least you can get the idea.
>
> -Mark
>
>
>
Try this:
http://www.galatea.com/flashguides/apache-tomcat-24-unix.xml
It's a little dated but at least you can get the idea.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Jan-Willem Goedheer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:50 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: building mo
try looking here:
http://www.osxgnu.org/software/java/jakarta/
D
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Jakarta Tomcat Newsgroup wrote:
> Subject: Re: building mod_jk on solaris
> From: "Jack Gao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ===
> Sorry, I don't have any experience with FreeBSD
Subject: Re: building mod_jk on solaris
From: "Jack Gao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===
Sorry, I don't have any experience with FreeBSD.
Jack
"Peter Choe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> thanks for the info. do you have an idea
thanks for the info. do you have an idea where i can get it for freebsd
3.x? i have tried to compile the mod_jk but i keep getting errors.
At 12:25 PM 5/10/2002, you wrote:
>Subject: Re: building mod_jk on solaris
>From: "Jack Gao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ===
>
Subject: Re: building mod_jk on solaris
From: "Jack Gao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===
I think you need mod_jk for freebsd, because mod_jk.so will been loaded by
Apache, but not Tomcat.
I finally get mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from Tomcat-Connector-4.0.4-b2-src on
Solaris 7 platform bu
]]
Enviado el: viernes, 10 de mayo de 2002 15:24
Para: Tomcat Users List
Asunto: RE: building mod_jk on solaris
they only seem to have it for sparc. i am running an intel solaris.
if i have apache running on a freebsd machine, and tomcat running on a
solaris machine, which mod_jk should i get
t: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: building mod_jk on solaris
> This is some info of how I built it on solaris sparc boxes. It was using
> tomcat 33 though, and you have to change the directories accordingly.. Let
> me remind you that some of the things can actually already been fixe
/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so is present).
Mvgr,
Martin
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Larsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 16:02
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: building mod_jk on solaris
>
>
> apxs requires perl. You m
apxs requires perl. You must have perl installed prior to installation
of apache httpd in order for the apache install to correctly configure
apxs. Otherwise, I believe you are on the right track.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Choe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Peter,
You can use mod_jk with Tomcat3 or Tomcat4. I found it terribly hard to
compile it on Solaris 8 (sparc), so I downloaded the binary and it works
just fine for me. I'm connecting with Apache.
Duane
On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 08:52 AM, Peter Choe wrote:
> i am trying to build mod_jk
they only seem to have it for sparc. i am running an intel solaris.
if i have apache running on a freebsd machine, and tomcat running on a
solaris machine, which mod_jk should i get and where should i place it, on
the solaris or the freebsd?
thanks.
At 09:15 AM 5/10/2002, =?us-ascii?Q?Ion_La
Hi,
I think that mod_jk is included within the connectors
package (jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.2-01-src.tar.gz for
instance), so you should try to get it from there.
Hope it helps,
Ion
-Mensaje original-
De: Peter Choe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: viernes, 10 de mayo de
I no longer need help on the following:
I am attempting to use the build-unix.sh included with tomcat 3.3 release
to call the apxs command and build the mod_jk module.
I receive the following error:
apxs:Break: Command failed with rc=16711680
I modified the build-un
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: building mod_jk
best archives in the world http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/
/===\
| Micky Mimo|
| Systems Specialist|
| (781) 457 - 1317 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED
or it
> in the Tomcat User Archives?
>
> Rob Abernethy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pogo Com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 4:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: building mod_jk
>
>
&
Title: RE: building mod_jk
best archives in the world http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/
/===\
| Micky Mimo |
| Systems Specialist |
| (781) 457 - 1317 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED
riginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of andy oliver
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: building mod_jk
>
>
> Are you on Solaris (I assume)? What version? What
> is your exa
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of andy oliver
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: building mod_jk
>
>
> Are you on Solaris (I assume)? What version? What
> is your ex
EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andy oliver
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: building mod_jk
Are you on Solaris (I assume)? What version? What is your exact apxs
command as yo
Are you on Solaris (I assume)? What version? What is your exact apxs command
as
you are entering it?
"Robert D. Abernethy IV" wrote:
> I am attempting to compile mod_jk.so and am having some difficulty. The
> apxs command stops with the following error:
>
> apxs:Break: Command failed with rc
I've tried this one before.
It does not work for Apache/Solaris.
--- Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.ccl.net/cca/software/UNIX/apache/solaris-t3.2/files/mod_jk.so
>
> let me know if this one works for you, otherwise I have compiled one for
> Apache 1.3.14. SunOS 5.8 myself
I've tried this one before.
It does not work for Apache/Solaris.
--- Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.ccl.net/cca/software/UNIX/apache/solaris-t3.2/files/mod_jk.so
>
> let me know if this one works for you, otherwise I have compiled one for
> Apache 1.3.14. SunOS 5.8 myself
I've tried this one before.
It does not work for Apache/Solaris.
--- Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.ccl.net/cca/software/UNIX/apache/solaris-t3.2/files/mod_jk.so
>
> let me know if this one works for you, otherwise I have compiled one for
> Apache 1.3.14. SunOS 5.8 myself
http://www.ccl.net/cca/software/UNIX/apache/solaris-t3.2/files/mod_jk.so
let me know if this one works for you, otherwise I have compiled one for
Apache 1.3.14. SunOS 5.8 myself
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Chris Stavros
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 10:31 AM
> > Here is the answer. You didn't install apxs. If you are working with
> > redhat distribution you will find it in apache-devel package.
>
> Actually, yes he did, as it's apxs that throws out the error.
> What he didn't do, was compile DSO support into Apache.
>
> Re-run the Apache configure
> > www# apxs -o
> > mod_jk.so -I../jk -I/usr/local/jdk1.2.2/include -I/usr/local/jdk1.2
> > .2/include/linux -c *.c ../jk/*.c
> > apxs:Error: Sorry, no DSO support for Apache available
>
> Here is the answet. You didn't install apxs. If you are working with
> redhat distribution you will find it
O~~
Thank you very much!!!
but i'm using FreeBSD + Apache 1.3.12
how to install apxs??
Thank
- Original Message -
From: "Michal Biernacki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 4:42 PM
Subject: RE: building mod_
> www# apxs -o
> mod_jk.so -I../jk -I/usr/local/jdk1.2.2/include -I/usr/local/jdk1.2
> .2/include/linux -c *.c ../jk/*.c
> apxs:Error: Sorry, no DSO support for Apache available
Here is the answet. You didn't install apxs. If you are working with
redhat distribution you will find it in apache-dev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 02:51:50 -0500
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Building mod_jk on Mac OS X
>
> On 12/27/00 9:10 AM, "Tom Woteki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am attempting to build mod_jk on Mac OS X (because
On 12/27/00 9:10 AM, "Tom Woteki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am attempting to build mod_jk on Mac OS X (because I don't think there is a
> pre-built binary). The build fails because the directive #include in
> source code fails. There seems to be no such header file anywhere in the OS X
> pu
Title: Building mod_jk on Mac OS X
I
don't know if this is helpful...but on my system dlfcn.h is in
/usr/include. On my system it appears to be a support header file for the
compiler/linker that defines some dynamic loading symbol routines and parameters
for them. My platform is IBM AIX.
Hi,
I get the same problem. Can anyone help us on this??
I've also tried to do "gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o".
I believe that this was from an earlier posting
by Dave Newton.
This however gave a different type of problem.
Please help.
Thanks,
Simon
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
53 matches
Mail list logo
