Carlos wrote:
> can you say me where are these tests?
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matt Goss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:11 PM
> Subject: Re: linux->NT->MSsqlServer
>
> > Ditto..
12:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Linux->NT->MSsqlServer
>
>
> Yes, the atinav driver forces you to use a single statement
> throughout a
> transaction.
> And in the freeTDS driver, the transaction is connected with
> the statement.
>
> How a
can you say me where are these tests?
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Goss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: linux->NT->MSsqlServer
> Ditto...
> I'm also using the JTurbo 2.0 JDBC
intermediate layer and
making
things complicated and to avoid one more source of possible errors.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Goss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: linux->NT->MSsqlServer
Ditto...
I'm als
Ditto...
I'm also using the JTurbo 2.0 JDBC driver, and on benchmark tests against Bea's
Weblogic JDBC driver, it came up 5 times faster!
Matt
Eric Hartmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've test two drivers JDBC for Microsoft SQL Server 7 / 2000. jdbcKona
> driver from BEA (does not works with SQL 2000)
I'm using jdbc from freetds project.
It's very small, very good and very easy to use
(JDBC level 4).
Thanks to freetds development team.
My environment is:
Good components:
Linux (best linux) on intel
apache 1.3.14
tomcat 3.2
jdbc:freetds 0.51
Bad components:
Windows NT4.0
MSSQLServe
Hello,
I've test two drivers JDBC for Microsoft SQL Server 7 / 2000. jdbcKona
driver from BEA (does not works with SQL 2000) and JTurbo from Ashna. JTurbo
2.0 (www.jturbo.com) is a very good driver for SQL Server. It's fast and
reliable with my tests. I didn't test it on Linux but you can downloa
