, April 15, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Does the shm play a role in this? I note that you have the following:
[shm]
info=Scoreboard. Requried for reconfiguration and status with multiprocess
servers.
file=anon
#size=104856
The docs at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/configwebcom.htm
l#How%20Load%20Balancing%20Works have been improved. Try reading them
again.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL
-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Thanks but it doesn't seem to make any difference. For each tomcat server I
added sections like the following
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Yes. I did a full stop and start of apache. There are no errors in the log
files either. Do you, or anyone else, have a workers2.properties file of a
working system that you are willing to share? I've gone through
]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Yes. I did a full stop and start of apache. There are no errors in the log
files either. Do you, or anyone else, have a workers2.properties file of a
working
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:42 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Thanks. The only change that you made to the tomcat server.xml conf file is
assigning your
:/webtest/*]
info=Test JSP Page
group=lb
[status:]
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Yes. I did a full stop
page, kind of strange.
Yang
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Does the shm play a role in this? I note that you have the following
Some members of this list have reported that the load
balancing is broken as the instances of mod_jk[2]
don't know the load of each other. So mod_jk[2] will
balance to some extend but not as good as it could/should.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I think you need to further define the workers with
{ajp13:psahammerhead:8009]
channel=channel.socket:psahammerhead:8009
group=lb
...
etc
hope this helps.
Yang
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL
Thanks but it doesn't seem to make any difference. For each tomcat server I
added sections like the following:
[ajp13:psahammerhead:8009]
channel=channel.socket:psahammerhead:8009
group=lb
tomcatId=psahammerhead
It still only wants to use one of the servers. There are other properties that
: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Thanks but it doesn't seem to make any difference. For each tomcat server I
added sections like the following:
[ajp13:psahammerhead:8009]
channel=channel.socket:psahammerhead
12 matches
Mail list logo
