Re: help on mod_jk

2003-04-04 Thread John Turner
Also, it looks like you have downloaded mod_jk2, in which case the correct LoadModule syntax is not LoadModule jk_module but LoadModule jk2_module John On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:32:19 -0800, Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: looks like you are trying to use the mod_jk compiled for Apache 1.

RE: help on mod_jk

2003-04-03 Thread Filip Hanik
looks like you are trying to use the mod_jk compiled for Apache 1.3 with Apache 2.0 could that be it? I can only take from your path /usr/local/apache2 that it is an apache 2.0 instance filip > -Original Message- > From: Paul Hsu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003

Re: Help on mod_jk for tomcat 4.0.x + httpd 2.0.40 on RedHat 8.0

2003-04-03 Thread John Turner
My advice? Delete that Apache install using RPM, and install your own from the source package. On a RH 8 server, installing Apache from source takes about 5 minutes and is about as painless as drinking a glass of water. The RH Apache is a modded Apache install. Anytime I've ever used their A

Re: Help on mod_jk for tomcat 4.0.x + httpd 2.0.40 on RedHat 8.0

2003-04-03 Thread Prasanth S
Bill, Thanks for the reply. So, what do u suggest, shall i try removin the '--enable-EAPI' option. but then the 'no-apche given' will not be rectified... --- Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The "no apache given" warning is a red-herring. It > is simply saying that it > can't build

Re: Help on mod_jk for tomcat 4.0.x + httpd 2.0.40 on RedHat 8.0

2003-04-03 Thread Bill Barker
The "no apache given" warning is a red-herring. It is simply saying that it can't build mod_jk for non-so. You also shouldn't have to specify '--enable-EAPI', since that will be picked up from the apxs settings. I've never tried to build mod_jk1.2.x on RH myself. It works well enough under Sola