On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:37, John Turner wrote:
> Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize if that was the
> way it came across.
That's OK - I am slow at re-integrating newbie mode...
> - the actual URL you are typing into the browser's address bar (or the
> value of your For
37 AM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Re: installing a servlet
>
>
>Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize if that was
the
>way it came across.
>
>JK and JK2 work.
>
>The difference that you have encountered moving to 4.1.24 is most
likel
Mostly agree with John. But I love jk2 because it is simple to config.
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 24, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: installing a servlet
Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize if
Sorry, it wasn't my intent to criticize anyone, I apologize if that was the
way it came across.
JK and JK2 work.
The difference that you have encountered moving to 4.1.24 is most likely
attributable to the Invoker servlet being disabled by default. It is
disabled by default for a reason: secu
This is also on my wish list for docs. To have many many examples, for example:
jk (worker.properties && http.conf)
- Simple
- With advanced options
- With multiple workers (one host)
- With multiple workers & loadbalancer (one host)
- With multiple workers & mulitple loadbalancers (one host)
- Al
03 10:25 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: installing a servlet
Howdy,
>There seems to be a great deal of discussion about JK2. I know that
JK2
>is the outstanding issue for me in getting Tomcat running. Maybe it
JK2 is not required to get tomcat running. It's one option tha
Howdy,
>There seems to be a great deal of discussion about JK2. I know that
JK2
>is the outstanding issue for me in getting Tomcat running. Maybe it
JK2 is not required to get tomcat running. It's one option that you can
use if you want to connect Apache to tomcat.
Yoav Shapira
This e-ma
-
From: Tony Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 24, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: installing a servlet
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:42, John Turner wrote:
> Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST thing you could do, for
all
> sorts of reasons. Security, for o
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:42, John Turner wrote:
> Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST thing you could do, for all
> sorts of reasons. Security, for one. Performance, for another. Future
> extensibility and growth, for another.
My question was: downgrade to mod_jk? (I have read that
If people are having problems getting mod_jk to work there are
probably reasons. It may be true that mod_jk works but not always as
expected. I have a system that works fine until mod_jk gets involved
then java starts barfing up 'exceptions' on a couple of jsp's.
Naturally the developers cla
grateful to many people in this list.
Good luck - don't go backwards, go forwards...
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 June 2003 13:42
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: installing a servlet
Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the
Donwgrading and using mod_webapp is the WORST thing you could do, for all
sorts of reasons. Security, for one. Performance, for another. Future
extensibility and growth, for another.
Mod_jk and mod_jk2 work. This is a fact. There's nothing anyone can do if
you want to give up learning how
>From my work of yesterday it seems that the easiest way to get a servlet
to run is to downgrade to Tomcat 4.0.x and use mod_webapp...
This isn't a very encouraging experience.
Cheers
Tony Grant
--
www.tgds.net Library management software toolkit,
redhat linux on Sony Vaio C1XD,
Dreamweaver MX
ok i forgotten to tell i tried it but i get an error liket that :
"BIND_error Adress in use"
- Original Message -
From: "John Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:10 PM
Subject:
No problem, glad I could help.
John
On 23 Jun 2003 19:33:40 +0200, Tony Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 14:49, John Turner wrote:
thanks for your kind patience John! Reading through the FAQs this seems
to be a common problem and others seem to have fixed it much more
easi
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 14:49, John Turner wrote:
thanks for your kind patience John! Reading through the FAQs this seems
to be a common problem and others seem to have fixed it much more
easily...
> There's no URL mapping in workers2.properties that would send your servlet
> request to Tomcat.
>
There's no URL mapping in workers2.properties that would send your servlet
request to Tomcat.
The only requests for www.tgds.net that will ever get to Tomcat are those
URLs that end in "*.jsp" because of this mapping:
[uri:www.tgds.net/*.jsp]
If you want to map another URI, such as "www.tgds.n
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 14:33, John Turner wrote:
> Please post:
- workers2.properties
# Define the communication channel
[shm]
file=/var/log/shm.file
size=1048576
# Example socket channel, override port and host.
[channel.socket:localhost:8009]
port=8009
host=127.0.0.1
# define the worker
[ajp1
Please post:
- JkMount statements from Apache's httpd.conf (or other file if they are
included into httd.conf)
- workers.properties
- relevant Host section from server.xml
- relevant Context section from server.xml
- servlet and servlet-mapping tags for this servlet from web.xml
John
On 20 Jun
19 matches
Mail list logo