Turner, John wrote:
On that note, there is no need to build the Java side of the connectors when
building. All you need is the Apache side, and this can be done with
./configurethere is no need to run ant or anything else to get a
connector binary, as the JAR binaries of the connectors are
binaries of the connectors are already included
in the Tomcat package.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert L Sowders [mailto:rsowders@;usgs.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:50 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: mod_jk - Apache 2.0.43 - Tomcat 4.1.12
List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: mod_jk - Apache 2.0.43 - Tomcat 4.1.12 config issues on
Solaris 8
;-)
Thanks for your reply.
Many apologies, my transcription efforts were not as good as they should
have been.
Rest assured that I didn't have any
Regards
Tref Gare
-Original Message-
From: Robert L Sowders [mailto:rsowders@;usgs.gov]
Sent: Wed 23/10/2002 16:49
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk - Apache 2.0.43 - Tomcat 4.1.12 config issues on Solaris 8
Answers intermixed below,
"Tref Gare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/22/2002 07:20 PM
Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:mod_jk - Apache 2.0.43 - Tomcat 4.1.12 config issues on
Solaris 8
>Hi Folks,
>We're having more th
In the hope that someone can clarify how this has worked or that this will help
someone else, I seem to have resolved the issue we were having getting mod_jk working
with Apache 2.0.43 and Tomcat 4.1.12.
As far as I can make out the problem was associated with the automatically configured
m
