Friday, July 11, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk again
As far as Tomcat is concerned, "192.168.168.35" is a valid virtual host,
so
unless you have a Host container in server.xml for it, or have an Alias
container for it to alias it to an already defined virtual ho
Got it - I just changed ServerName and mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk again
As far as Tomcat is concerned, "192.168.168.35" is a valid virtual host, so
unless you have a Host container in server.xml for it,
As far as Tomcat is concerned, "192.168.168.35" is a valid virtual host, so
unless you have a Host container in server.xml for it, or have an Alias
container for it to alias it to an already defined virtual host in
server.xml, Tomcat won't recognize it and will default to the "defaultHost"
spec
Justin:
My only objective is to get a working copy of mod_jk.
I downloaded a binary from John Turner's how-to page (I cannot find
binary connectors on the jakarta website---what URL do you have for
them?) but I have so far been unable to make it work. I now think it's
my configuration, not th
Jerry,
I've never tried building mod_jk from source as the files always existed
on the Jakarta website. Although I don't see it here, are you looking
to perform a "customized" compile? If not, is there another reason to
compile from source instead of using the binaries? I've never had any
proble
