Hrmmm, perhaps I should reboot using the non-SMP kernel and try it. I'll
have to do that when I get back to the servers.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:04 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0
rd Edition (build 1.4.2_03-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_03-b02, mixed mode)
same on both
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]
b02, mixed mode)
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:05 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
sun JDK 1.4.2 for Linux
Kernel 2.4.20-8smp
Tomcat 5.0.16 with catalina-cluster.jar from CVS head
ECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:59 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Now that's really very strange. I am running RH9 and everything seems to go
through just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
interesting, mine doesn't work at all unless I set the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
what VM (version and name) are you using?
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:59
interesting, mine doesn't work at all unless I set the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
what VM (version and name) are you using?
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:59 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0
Now that's really very strange. I am running RH9 and everything seems to go
through just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
The replic
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Just tried the CVS head and everything works with any CPU going crazy!
only if ld_assume_kernel is set to 2.4
One more question fo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:33 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Just tried the CVS head and everything works with any CPU going crazy!
only if ld_assume_kernel is set to 2.4
One more question for
I don't seem to need the ld_assume_kernel thing. What are the symptoms when
it is required?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Just tried the CVS
ut after a long time.
>>
>> I set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 and it started to work
>>
>> Filip
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:43 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: RE:
I will be implementing some performance improvements today.
I'll let you know how it goes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 4:33 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Hurray for Fillip! :)
Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
ok guys,
good news. The 100% cpu is totally my fault. I messed up on that one.
I was registering OP_WRITE as an interest
this is not good :)
checking in the working
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
ok guys,
good news. The 100% cpu is totally my fault. I messed up on that one.
I was registering OP_WRITE as an interest
this is not good :)
checking in the working code in 15 min, some more r
work
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
ok guys,
good news. The 100% cpu is totally my fault. I messed up on that one.
I was registering OP_WRITE as an int
: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:54 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
another code change was, that I am now accepting keys for OP_READ and
OP_WRITE. before it was only OP_READ,
but for synchronous replication I need both.
this is good info, I just got RH9 installed. will be
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
The only changes in the ReplicationListener class is the try catch that
was added.
the code logic is the same. Weird enough. So it's probably elsewhere
that some
004 12:25 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
More content for you Filip.
I've checked and followed the code of the listen event in
ReplicationListener.java
Here's what happening:
selector.select(timeout) -> return immediatly with one SelectorKey availabl
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:25 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
More content for you Filip.
I've checked and followed the code of the listen event in
ReplicationListener.java
Here's what happening:
selector.select(timeout) -> ret
g today. Will let you know how it goes
also, try asynchronous replication, does it still go to 100%?
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:08 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Oka
oing today. Will let you know how it goes
also, try asynchronous replication, does it still go to 100%?
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:08 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Ends up doing the same thing.
The variable was set. I checked it with an echo.
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:05 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
you should do
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
you should do
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
not
export set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
in regular bash shell
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 1:38 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:03 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Okay, I reverted back to the 5.0.16 version and now I don't have the high
CPU ute.
But it takes almost 60 seconds for the Manager to requ
stem level as opposed the the java executable. Sounds
like
alot of the load may be in system calls.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 2:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I'll try
e the java executable. Sounds
like
alot of the load may be in system calls.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 2:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I'll try to get an instance going toda
t.
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 1:58 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
100% cpu can mean that you have a multicast problem, try to run
java -cp tomcat-replication.jar MCaster
downlo
Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 1:58 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
100% cpu can mean that you have a multicast problem, try to run
java -cp tomcat-replication.jar MCaster
download the jar from http://cvs.apache.org/~f
100% cpu can mean that you have a multicast problem, try to run
java -cp tomcat-replication.jar MCaster
download the jar from http://cvs.apache.org/~fhanik/
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 6:51 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTEC
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Currently running tomcat 5.0.16 with the CVS HEAD of the replication module.
This is under redhat 9. So far so good.
What kind of problem did you encounter under rh9?
Jean-Philippe
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 1:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Currently running tomcat 5.0.16 with the CVS HEAD of the replication module.
This is under redhat 9. So far so good.
What kind of
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Currently running tomcat 5.0.16 with the CVS HEAD of the replication module.
This is under redhat 9. So far so good.
What kind of problem did you encounter under rh9?
Jean-Philippe Bélanger
Currently running tomcat 5.0.16 with the CVS HEAD of the replication module.
This is under redhat 9. So far so good.
What kind of problem did you encounter under rh9?
Jean-Philippe Bélanger
Filip Hanik wrote:
my only experience with Redhat 9 is that it doesn't play well with NIO.
I have not succ
my only experience with Redhat 9 is that it doesn't play well with NIO.
I have not successfully ran tomcat clustering on RH9, I use RH8.
I also don't have a RH9 machine at home yet, so I can't develop for it
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wedne
ik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 8:07 PM
To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
it will come out in the next release.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 8:07 PM
To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
it will come out in the next release.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Tomcat
it will come out in the next release.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Tomcat-user
Subject: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
The new tomcat 5.0.16 replication seams to work odly.
>From what I've read from
38 matches
Mail list logo
