RE: tomcat 5.0.19 cluster problem

2004-02-23 Thread Filip Hanik \(lists\)
: tomcat 5.0.19 cluster problem Filip Hanik (lists) wrote: >>In any case could a cluster node that ran out of memory destroy the >>entire cluster? >> >> > >it shouldn't, it can temporary slow it down if the node that is down is >accepting connections and broa

Re: tomcat 5.0.19 cluster problem

2004-02-23 Thread Antonio Fiol BonnĂ­n
Filip Hanik (lists) wrote: In any case could a cluster node that ran out of memory destroy the entire cluster? it shouldn't, it can temporary slow it down if the node that is down is accepting connections and broad casting its membership. I'm running a load test right now with the latest vers

RE: tomcat 5.0.19 cluster problem

2004-02-22 Thread Filip Hanik \(lists\)
e sure that I am not BS:ing you here :) Filip -Original Message- From: Filip Hanik (lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 5:51 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.19 cluster problem I haven't tested clustering on Solaris 9, but on linux it

RE: tomcat 5.0.19 cluster problem

2004-02-22 Thread Filip Hanik \(lists\)
I haven't tested clustering on Solaris 9, but on linux it works great. There is something funky with your multicast, as you can see there are members added and disappearing all the time. Try to increase your mcastDropTime, that should keep the members in the cluster for a longer time. contact me at