Just wanted to add using jk2 with a unix pipe. I am suprised to find
that on Linux at least, the pipe is not as fast as sockets.
-walter
+--+
| Tomcat | Apache| Connector| Mean |
| Version | Version | | Connection |
Walter Truitt wrote:
I know that my tests don't compare directly to the other post, and it
doesn't look like there is as much of a change in performance as the
other tests showed between versions. The HelloWorldExample servlet
was 1.2% faster using 5.0.19 compared to 4.1.30 with the HTTP
Connector
I pray for that day, but not holding my breath.
:)
peter
"Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Great stuff, thanks for posting. Now if we could only get people to
search the archives before posting questions ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-
t;To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: tomcat5/tomcat4 comparison
>
>Posting my findings for Redhat Linux 7.3 on a Intel Zeon 2.4 with a GB
>of ram. My kernel is not SMP even though the Zeon has hyperthreading.
>I also ran ab on the same machine as apache and tom
Posting my findings for Redhat Linux 7.3 on a Intel Zeon 2.4 with a GB
of ram. My kernel is not SMP even though the Zeon has hyperthreading.
I also ran ab on the same machine as apache and tomcat.
I was interested in seeing the WARP connector maintained, so I also
include those numbers in my test
Howdy,
>Up there amongst the best reasons is availability of support. As with
>all OSS, you benefit by aligning yourself to the "main" trunk of
>development from a bug fix and *especially* forum support
point-of-view.
>
>Many (most, it seems) of the regular contributors to this list have
>migrat
ve
migrated to Tomcat5, so there's less of an audience anxious to work on
Tomcat4 problems.
justin
-Original Message-
From: QM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 3/30/2004 11:55 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc:
Subject: Re: tomcat5/tomcat4 comparison
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09
ginal Message-
From: QM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 3/30/2004 11:55 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc:
Subject: Re: tomcat5/tomcat4 comparison
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:44:23AM -0800, Neil MacMillan wrote:
: Hi all, I'm trying to gather all the information I can about pr
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:44:23AM -0800, Neil MacMillan wrote:
: Hi all, I'm trying to gather all the information I can about pros/cons of
: migrating 10-15 servers from tomcat4 to tomcat5. I have been unsuccessful in
: finding some good performance comparisons, and major feature differences
: b
Forgot the following:
Apache 2.0.49 (405 bytes html file)
Total transferred: 687 bytes
HTML transferred: 405 bytes
Requests per second:630.80 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 15.853 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 1.585 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests
Just a quick compare using 'ab -n 1 -c 25'
4.1.30
Total transferred: 553 bytes
HTML transferred: 405 bytes
Requests per second:447.18 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 55.905 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 2.236 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
T
11 matches
Mail list logo
